27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36996507)
1. Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.
Barufaldi B; Zuckerman SP; Medeiros RB; Maidment AD; Schiabel H
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():137-149. PubMed ID: 32143121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of average glandular dose in mammography practice of a teaching hospital in Ghana.
Kyei KA; Anim-Sampong S; Ahulu EN; Antwi WK; Daniels J
Pan Afr Med J; 2024; 47():42. PubMed ID: 38681097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.
Fedon C; Caballo M; García E; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1436-1447. PubMed ID: 33452822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period.
Ramnarain J; Cartwright L; Diffey J
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 38019445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.
Zhang M; Chu C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 21725621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
Freer PE; Winkler N
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of patient dose during a digital breast tomosynthesis.
Shakya S; Sulwathura U; Wickramanayake M; Dulshara T; Herath LHMIM; Wickramasinghe WMIS; Senanayake G
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):573-576. PubMed ID: 36996507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.
Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah SA
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 32495513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study.
Asbeutah AM; Brindhaban A; AlMajran AA; Asbeutah SA
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):e129-e133. PubMed ID: 32052759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
