2107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3699678)
1. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis. Analysis of long-term evolution.
Alvarez L; Escudero C; Figuera D; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Nov; 104(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 1434701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
Horstkotte D
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Replacement of the mitral and aortic valves with bioprostheses. Long-term results].
Colombo T; Cicardi C; Peronace B; Pozzi M; Gordini V; Pellegrini A
G Ital Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 15(10):974-82. PubMed ID: 4092917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley monostrut prosthesis: a 4-year clinical experience].
Alajmo F; Perna AM; Calamai G; Nigro R; Cassai M; Montesi G; Braconi L; Borgioli A; Preziuso M; Palminiello A
G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2328857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve replacements].
Mühlberger V; Schistek R; Hopferwieser T; Schwaiger A; Scharfetter H; Knapp E
Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 3751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Aortic valve replacement: technique and outcome with artificial heart valves and allografts].
Vogt PR; Turina MI
Ther Umsch; 1998 Dec; 55(12):737-45. PubMed ID: 10025187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term results of the surgical treatment in acute aortic valve endocarditis].
Vogt PR; Brunner-LaRocca HP
Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():27-34. PubMed ID: 11826819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
