These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36997717)

  • 1. The effect of auditory valence on subsequent visual semantic processing.
    Gao C; Hayes WM; LaPierre M; Shinkareva SV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1928-1938. PubMed ID: 36997717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modality-general representations of valences perceived from visual and auditory modalities.
    Gu J; Cao L; Liu B
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116199. PubMed ID: 31536804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal negativity bias in semantic processing.
    Gao C; Wedell DH; Shinkareva SV
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1270-1280. PubMed ID: 33211510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.
    Sakaki M; Gorlick MA; Mather M
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1263-78. PubMed ID: 22142207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative valence specific deficits in judgements of musical affective quality in alexithymia.
    Larwood JL; Vanman EJ; Dingle GA
    Cogn Emot; 2021 May; 35(3):500-509. PubMed ID: 31906793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotion processing in the aging brain is modulated by semantic elaboration.
    Ritchey M; Bessette-Symons B; Hayes SM; Cabeza R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Mar; 49(4):640-50. PubMed ID: 20869375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When affect overlaps with concept: emotion recognition in semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.
    Bertoux M; Duclos H; Caillaud M; Segobin S; Merck C; de La Sayette V; Belliard S; Desgranges B; Eustache F; Laisney M
    Brain; 2020 Dec; 143(12):3850-3864. PubMed ID: 33221846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition.
    Gao C; Shinkareva SV; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2144-2159. PubMed ID: 35113643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory attention enhances processing of positive and negative words in inferior and superior prefrontal cortex.
    Wegrzyn M; Herbert C; Ethofer T; Flaisch T; Kissler J
    Cortex; 2017 Nov; 96():31-45. PubMed ID: 28961524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of positive and negative emotional associations on semantic processing in depression: an fMRI study.
    Sass K; Habel U; Kellermann T; Mathiak K; Gauggel S; Kircher T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Feb; 35(2):471-82. PubMed ID: 23033120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional Arousal and Valence Jointly Modulate the Auditory Response: A 40-Hz ASSR Study.
    Zhang L; Liu S; Liu X; Zhang B; An X; Ming D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1150-1157. PubMed ID: 34110997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: an event-related fMRI study.
    Dolcos F; LaBar KS; Cabeza R
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15325353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vivid: How valence and arousal influence word processing under different task demands.
    Delaney-Busch N; Wilkie G; Kuperberg G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):415-32. PubMed ID: 26833048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do valence and meaning interact? The contribution of semantic control.
    Souter NE; Reddy A; Walker J; Marino Dávolos J; Jefferies E
    J Neuropsychol; 2023 Sep; 17(3):521-539. PubMed ID: 37010272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention to affect 2.0: Multiple effects of emotion and attention on event-related potentials of visual word processing in a valence-detection task.
    Gibbons H; Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Sep; 59(9):e14059. PubMed ID: 35484815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotion modulates early auditory response to speech.
    Wang J; Nicol T; Skoe E; Sams M; Kraus N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2121-8. PubMed ID: 18855553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of valence and arousal on written word recognition: time course and ERP correlates.
    Citron FM; Weekes BS; Ferstl EC
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Jan; 533():90-5. PubMed ID: 23142715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explicit semantic stimulus categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing.
    Schupp HT; Schmälzle R; Flaisch T
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 9(11):1738-45. PubMed ID: 24194577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosody Dominates Over Semantics in Emotion Word Processing: Evidence From Cross-Channel and Cross-Modal Stroop Effects.
    Lin Y; Ding H; Zhang Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 63(3):896-912. PubMed ID: 32186969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.