These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3699797)

  • 1. More hospitals join fight against Ohio Blues plans.
    Burda D
    Hospitals; 1986 May; 60(9):54. PubMed ID: 3699797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans.
    Richman D
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competitive bidding: they're singing the blues in Cleveland.
    Onusko TJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Feb; 40(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 10275007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ohio court upholds merger, finds bidding plan illegal.
    Baker C
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun; 8(12):5-7. PubMed ID: 10272361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues.
    Haradine J
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blue Cross and private nursing service. Case in point: Heiser v. Blue Cross of Ohio (401 N.E. 2d 483--OH).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1980 Jul; 21(2):2. PubMed ID: 6903376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court upholds hospitals' suit against Blue Cross.
    Am Med News; 1979 Jul; 22(27):8. PubMed ID: 10242755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toledo Hospital, Blue Cross plan in $2.5 billion suit.
    Robinson ML
    Hospitals; 1988 Aug; 62(15):28-9. PubMed ID: 3391564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Va. report: drop special rules for Blues.
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Nov; 82(44):2, 26. PubMed ID: 10238875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient challenged Blue Cross denial of ER payment.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Nov; 59(11):82, 83, 90. PubMed ID: 700687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blues have right to trim payments.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Jul; 10(7):133, 136. PubMed ID: 10248392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3 Ohio Blues plans fight forced merger law.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Jun; 23(24):4. PubMed ID: 10126319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system.
    Cohn A
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenge to Blues' tax-exemption seen as signal to healthcare industry.
    Anderson HJ; Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Dec; 15(25):18-20. PubMed ID: 10274654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Michigan law treats Blues plan like public agency, not private institution.
    LaViolette S
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10250327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
    Halper HR; Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.".
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
    Burda D
    Hospitals; 1986 Nov; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FTC eyes ban of M.D. input into HMOs, Blues.
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec; 9(12):32. PubMed ID: 503022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Michigan, Ohio Blues revive preadmission certification.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Aug; 7(8):93-6. PubMed ID: 10257440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.