170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36998604)
1. Does paternal care influence mate preference? Male and female mating behavior in Threespine Stickleback ecotypes that differ markedly in parental care.
Corney RH; Weir LK
Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9953. PubMed ID: 36998604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.
Head ML; Kozak GM; Boughman JW
Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2183-96. PubMed ID: 23919161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Courtship behavior, nesting microhabitat, and assortative mating in sympatric stickleback species pairs.
Dean LL; Dunstan HR; Reddish A; MacColl ADC
Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(4):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 33614001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual isolation promotes divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.
Berner D; Ammann M; Spencer E; Rüegg A; Lüscher D; Moser D
J Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 30(2):401-411. PubMed ID: 27862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.
McKinnon JS; Hamele N; Frey N; Chou J; McAleavey L; Greene J; Paulson W
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e37951. PubMed ID: 22701589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flexible mate choice may contribute to ecotype assortative mating in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus).
Jarvis WMC; Comeau SM; Colborne SF; Robinson BW
J Evol Biol; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1810-1820. PubMed ID: 28590579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
Conte GL; Schluter D
Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection?
Albert AY; Schluter D
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15212390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Male mate preference and size-assortative mating in convict cichlids: A role for female aggression?
Bloch AN; Estela VJ; Leese JM; Itzkowitz M
Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():81-5. PubMed ID: 27444247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
Lev A; Pischedda A
J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Female mate preference to maximize paternal care. II. Female competition leads to monogamy.
Iwasa Y; Harada Y
Am Nat; 1998 Apr; 151(4):367-82. PubMed ID: 18811327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mate preference in the painted goby: the influence of visual and acoustic courtship signals.
Amorim MC; da Ponte AN; Caiano M; Pedroso SS; Pereira R; Fonseca PJ
J Exp Biol; 2013 Nov; 216(Pt 21):3996-4004. PubMed ID: 23948469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does sexual experience affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in
Sinclair CS; Lisa SF; Pischedda A
Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 11(23):16981-16992. PubMed ID: 34938486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive assortative mating between recently described sympatric morphs of Icelandic sticklebacks.
Olafsdóttir GA; Ritchie MG; Snorrason SS
Biol Lett; 2006 Jun; 2(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 17148375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
