These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36999742)

  • 1. Effects of language mismatch in automatic forensic voice comparison using deep learning embeddings.
    Sztahó D; Fejes A
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):871-883. PubMed ID: 36999742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting Vocal Fatigue with Neural Embeddings.
    Bayerl SP; Wagner D; Baumann I; Bocklet T; Riedhammer K
    J Voice; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36774263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Basu N; Bali AS; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Dec; 341():111499. PubMed ID: 36283276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data strategies in forensic automatic speaker comparison.
    van der Vloed D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Sep; 350():111790. PubMed ID: 37567041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisensory Fusion for Unsupervised Spatiotemporal Speaker Diarization.
    Xylogiannis P; Vryzas N; Vrysis L; Dimoulas C
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 39001008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Few-shot short utterance speaker verification using meta-learning.
    Wang W; Zhao H; Yang Y; Chang Y; You H
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1276. PubMed ID: 37346533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings.
    Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29291950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ensemble learning with speaker embeddings in multiple speech task stimuli for depression detection.
    Liu Z; Yu H; Li G; Chen Q; Ding Z; Feng L; Yao Z; Hu B
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1141621. PubMed ID: 37034153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validations of an alpha version of the E
    Weber P; Enzinger E; Labrador B; Lozano-Díez A; Ramos D; González-Rodríguez J; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100223. PubMed ID: 35281657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of deep speaker embeddings for diarisation.
    Sun G; Zhang C; Woodland PC
    Neural Netw; 2021 Sep; 141():372-384. PubMed ID: 33984663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic Speaker Verification Using Ordinary Least Squares.
    Machado TJ; Vieira Filho J; de Oliveira MA
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31658784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manifestation of depression in speech overlaps with characteristics used to represent and recognize speaker identity.
    Dumpala SH; Dikaios K; Rodriguez S; Langley R; Rempel S; Uher R; Oore S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11155. PubMed ID: 37429935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.
    Park SJ; Yeung G; Vesselinova N; Kreiman J; Keating PA; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):375. PubMed ID: 30075658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidential value of voice quality acoustics in forensic voice comparison.
    Chan RKW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111725. PubMed ID: 37182279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. H-VECTORS: Improving the robustness in utterance-level speaker embeddings using a hierarchical attention model.
    Shi Y; Huang Q; Hain T
    Neural Netw; 2021 Oct; 142():329-339. PubMed ID: 34098246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison.
    Leemann A; Kolly MJ; Dellwo V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():59-67. PubMed ID: 24675042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-learning with Latent Space Clustering in Generative Adversarial Network for Speaker Diarization.
    Pal M; Kumar M; Peri R; Park TJ; Kim SH; Lord C; Bishop S; Narayanan S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2021; 29():1204-1219. PubMed ID: 33997106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Bali AS; Basu N; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112048. PubMed ID: 38733653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition.
    Zhang C; Tan T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):118-22. PubMed ID: 17646071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
    Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.