BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36999911)

  • 1. Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review.
    Arafa AT; Jain A; Skrobanek P; Humphrey B; Froelich JW; Antonarakis ES
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 36999911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PSMA-Based [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    Rowe SP; Macura KJ; Mena E; Blackford AL; Nadal R; Antonarakis ES; Eisenberger M; Carducci M; Fan H; Dannals RF; Chen Y; Mease RC; Szabo Z; Pomper MG; Cho SY
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Jun; 18(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 27080322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography with Piflufolastat F 18 for the Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer in the United States.
    Yee CW; Harvey MJ; Xin Y; Kirson NY
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Feb; 42(2):231-247. PubMed ID: 37934376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting
    Lee KH; Mena E; Shih J; Lindenberg L; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Patel KR; Citrin DE; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1419-1428. PubMed ID: 37775447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Piflufolastat F-18 (
    Voter AF; Werner RA; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG; Solnes LB; Rowe SP
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2022 Jul; 22(7):681-694. PubMed ID: 35603510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
    Mattana F; Muraglia L; Rajwa P; Zattoni F; Marra G; Chiu PKF; Heidegger I; Kasivisvanathan V; Kesch CV; Olivier J; Preisser F; Thibault C; Valerio M; van den Bergh RCN; Gandaglia G; Ceci F;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing digital to analog prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted piflufolastat 18 F PET/CT in prostate cancer patients in early biochemical failure.
    Maliha PG; Nolet B; Ebrahim A; Abikhzer G; Chaussé G; Bahoric B; Niazi T; Probst S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Mar; 44(3):187-193. PubMed ID: 36525002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of metastatic disease on
    Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
    BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of
    Sonni I; Eiber M; Fendler WP; Alano RM; Vangala SS; Kishan AU; Nickols N; Rettig MB; Reiter RE; Czernin J; Calais J
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 31924715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year trends of bone scan and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography utilization in prostate cancer: A retrospective review in a private centre.
    Haran C; McBean R; Parsons R; Wong D
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 30972933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
    Meijer D; Eppinga WSC; Mohede RM; Vanneste BGL; Meijnen P; Meijer OWM; Daniels LA; van den Bergh RCN; Lont AP; Ettema RH; Oudshoorn FHK; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Oprea-Lager DE; Schaake EE; Vis AN
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 35074282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in Management After
    Ng M; Guerrieri M; Wong LM; Taubman K; Sutherland T; Benson A; Byrne G; Koschel S; Yap K; Starmans M; Ong G; Macleod C; Foo M; Chao M
    J Nucl Med; 2022 Sep; 63(9):1343-1348. PubMed ID: 35058320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 and 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer.
    Witkowska-Patena E; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Miśko J; Budzyńska A; Walęcka-Mazur A
    Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Dec; 44(12):e629-e633. PubMed ID: 31689286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of incidental brain tumors in prostate cancer patients via PSMA PET/CT.
    McLaughlin LA; Yildirim O; Rosenblum MK; Imber BS; Haseltine JM; Zelefsky MJ; Schöder H; Morris MJ; Rafelson WM; Krebs S; Moss NS
    J Neurooncol; 2023 Jun; 163(2):455-462. PubMed ID: 37247180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey by the French Medicine Agency (ANSM) of the imaging protocol, detection rate, and safety of
    Chevalme YM; Boudali L; Gauthé M; Rousseau C; Skanjeti A; Merlin C; Robin P; Giraudet AL; Janier M; Talbot JN
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Aug; 48(9):2935-2950. PubMed ID: 33416958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of
    McCarthy M; Francis R; Tang C; Watts J; Campbell A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 30890448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.