These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3700043)

  • 1. The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images.
    Foley WD; Wilson CR; San Dretto M
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 3700043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
    Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Kheddache S; Vikgren J; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):109-13. PubMed ID: 15933090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.
    Foley WD; Wilson CR; Keyes GS; DiBianca FA; Scanlon GT; Schleuter D; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7291538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.
    Chakraborty DP; Breatnach ES; Yester MV; Soto B; Barnes GT; Fraser RG
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial.
    James TD; McAdams HP; Song JW; Li CM; Godfrey DJ; DeLong DM; Paik SH; Martinez-Jimenez S
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2554-7. PubMed ID: 18649488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of resolution and noise characteristics of digital radiographic detectors on the detectability of lung nodules.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1603-13. PubMed ID: 15259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
    Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histogram-directed processing of digital chest images.
    McAdams HP; Johnson GA; Suddarth SA; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 3957599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppression of translucent elongated structures: applications in chest radiography.
    Hogeweg L; Sanchez CI; van Ginneken B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2099-113. PubMed ID: 23880041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic range control processing of digital chest images. A clinical evaluation.
    Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kido S; Kondoh H; Johkoh T; Kohno N; Arisawa J; Kozuka T; Tanaka H; Nakajima N; Kato H
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Jan; 37(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 8611313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital radiography in thoracic diagnosis].
    Oestmann JW; Greene R
    Rofo; 1989 Apr; 150(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 2539628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):85-91. PubMed ID: 15933086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.