These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3700073)

  • 1. The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change.
    Weil WB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 3700073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Baby Doe regulations: governmental intervention in neonatal rescue medicine.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 6232863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Baby Doe rule: still a threat.
    Moskop JC; Saldanha RL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):8-14. PubMed ID: 3700081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The final, anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe.
    Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):5-9. PubMed ID: 4019172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C; Karnofsky EB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HHS preparing to issue new Baby Doe rules.
    Holden C
    Science; 1983 Sep; 221(4617):1269-70. PubMed ID: 6612339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW
    JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
    Rhoden NK; Arras JD
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants.
    Newman SA
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
    Britton JR
    West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant Doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant.
    Paris JJ; Fletcher AB
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 6557313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Section 504, handicapped newborns, and ethics committees: an alternative to the hotline.
    Doudera AE
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):200-2, 236. PubMed ID: 6557311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "Baby Doe" legislation: its rise and fall.
    Moss K
    Policy Stud J; 1987 Jun; 15(4):629-51. PubMed ID: 11651898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe.
    Carter BS
    J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.