69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3700078)
1. A schizophrenic decision on Conroy.
Bank LG
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 3700078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When procedures limit rights: from Quinlan to Conroy.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 4008237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in the Claire Conroy case.
Nevins MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1986 Feb; 34(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 3944404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy.
Burt RA
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In the matter of Claire C. Conroy.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3850083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In the matter of Nancy Ellen Jobes.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 3638288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing home residents' right to refuse treatment.
Eichler BL
J Med Soc N J; 1985 May; 82(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 3858550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.
Barkow JM
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 2515165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In the Matter of Claire C. Conroy, No. A-108 (N.J. Jan. 17, 1985).
Devlin MM
J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 10312027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Conroy decision.
Maressa VA
N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):957-8. PubMed ID: 3866979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The meaning of the Conroy decision.
Rothberg H
N J Med; 1985 Dec; 82(12):954-5. PubMed ID: 3866978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Termination of life-sustaining treatment for incompetent nursing home patients.
Hayman S
Med Law; 1987; 6(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 3574009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical dilemmas in the health care of older people.
Hickey T; Benedict CJ; Stilwell DL
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1994; 17(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 10153064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trilogy of cases on withdrawal of treatment.
Rice F
N J Nurse; 1988; 18(5):10, 12. PubMed ID: 3174414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.
Moore DL
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
