These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37002081)

  • 21. Increased medial olivocochlear reflex strength in normal-hearing, noise-exposed humans.
    Bhatt I
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184036. PubMed ID: 28886123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.
    Luebke AE; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1941-9. PubMed ID: 25234992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18725. PubMed ID: 21494578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?
    Mepani AM; Kirk SA; Hancock KE; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 31584501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
    Puria S; Guinan JJ; Liberman MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inputs from the cochlea and the inferior colliculus converge on olivocochlear neurones.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Hear Res; 2002 May; 167(1-2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12117543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plasticity due to noise conditioning.
    Brown MC; Kujawa SG; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 Jun; 79(6):3088-97. PubMed ID: 9636110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.
    Collet L; Kemp DT; Veuillet E; Duclaux R; Moulin A; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2312416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.
    Goodman SS; Mertes IB; Lewis JD; Weissbeck DK
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):829-42. PubMed ID: 23982894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 22457463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Central auditory pathways mediating the rat middle ear muscle reflexes.
    Lee DJ; de Venecia RK; Guinan JJ; Brown MC
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2006 Apr; 288(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16550576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying the Origin of Effects of Contralateral Noise on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Unanesthetized Mice.
    Xu Y; Cheatham MA; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 18(4):543-553. PubMed ID: 28303411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Neuroreport; 2015 May; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.
    Mertes IB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31584306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Brown MC; de Venecia RK; Guinan JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 14557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.