These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37003530)

  • 21. Marital Status Independently Predicts Glioma Patient Mortality: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
    Deng Z; Li X; Yang J; Yu H; Zhang N
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e302-e312. PubMed ID: 34058360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marital status and survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.
    Shi X; Zhang TT; Hu WP; Ji QH
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):28526-28543. PubMed ID: 28415710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does marital status impact postoperative survival in patients with less differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma? A population-based study.
    Yan B; Bai DS; Qian JJ; Zhang C; Jin SJ; Jiang GQ
    Cancer Med; 2019 Oct; 8(14):6272-6279. PubMed ID: 31476109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marital status impacts survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based, propensity-matched study.
    Wang K; Mao W; Shi H; Wang G; Yin L; Xie J; Ian LH; Zhang H; Peng B
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Aug; 9(4):1611-1629. PubMed ID: 32944523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of marital status on the survival of patients with operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A SEER-based study.
    Chen M; Wang X; Wei R; Wang Z
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2019 Jan; 34(1):e447-e463. PubMed ID: 30272828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Marital Status on Upper Digestive Tract Tumor Survival: Married Male Patients Exhibited a Better Prognosis.
    Qing M; Peng J; Shang Q; Xu H; Chen Q
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():880893. PubMed ID: 35478729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marital status and survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a multinomial propensity scores matched study.
    Du X; Zhan W; Li X; Yin S; Chen Q; Huang J; Chen Y; Liu J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):3005-3011. PubMed ID: 35034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marital Status and Survival of Patients with Chondrosarcoma: A Population-Based Analysis.
    Gao Z; Ren F; Song H; Wang Y; Wang Y; Gao Z; Zhu J; He X
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Sep; 24():6638-6648. PubMed ID: 30235178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of marital status at diagnosis on the survival of patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yang T; Xiao H; Sun F; Guo X
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2335-2345. PubMed ID: 36241859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of marital status on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with surgical resection: an analysis of 13,408 patients in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.
    Wu C; Chen P; Qian JJ; Jin SJ; Yao J; Wang XD; Bai DS; Jiang GQ
    Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):79442-79452. PubMed ID: 27769053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association between marital status and all-cause mortality of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study.
    Zhu S; Lei C
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9067. PubMed ID: 37277464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study.
    Ding W; Ruan G; Lin Y; Zhu J; Tu C; Li Z
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5421. PubMed ID: 33686220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of marital status on the survival of patients with colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: an analysis of the SEER database.
    Xiao K; Zhao Y; Cai Y; Chen P; Chen J; Ye R; Yuan B; Liu X
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Feb; 112(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31830797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marital status and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a SEER-based study.
    Wang X; Li X; Su S; Liu M
    Oncotarget; 2017 Oct; 8(51):89040-89054. PubMed ID: 29179497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of marital status on the survival of patients with multiple myeloma.
    Tang L; Pan Z; Zhang X
    Hematology; 2022 Dec; 27(1):187-197. PubMed ID: 35068385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marital status is an independent prognostic factor for tracheal cancer patients: an analysis of the SEER database.
    Li M; Dai CY; Wang YN; Chen T; Wang L; Yang P; Xie D; Mao R; Chen C
    Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(47):77152-77162. PubMed ID: 27780931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A real-world 1:1 propensity-matched study revealed unmarried status was independently associated with worse survival for patients with renal clear cell carcinoma.
    Zhang SL; Sun HT; Li ZM; Zhang ZY; Wang WR; Wang X; Wang ZM; Wang LS
    J Cancer; 2019; 10(16):3767-3777. PubMed ID: 31333794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marital status independently predicts testis cancer survival--an analysis of the SEER database.
    Abern MR; Dude AM; Coogan CL
    Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 20870430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of marital status on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database.
    Chen Q; Zhao J; Xue X; Xie X
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):75. PubMed ID: 38281955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effect of Marital Status on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Study.
    Wu SG; Zhang QH; Zhang WW; Sun JY; Lin Q; He ZY
    J Cancer; 2018; 9(10):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 29805714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.