These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37003731)

  • 21. Attempting Well-Tempered Funnel Metadynamics Simulations for the Evaluation of the Binding Kinetics of Methionine Aminopeptidase-II Inhibitors.
    Rubina ; Moin ST
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7729-7743. PubMed ID: 38059911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ranking of Ligand Binding Kinetics Using a Weighted Ensemble Approach and Comparison with a Multiscale Milestoning Approach.
    Ahn SH; Jagger BR; Amaro RE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5340-5352. PubMed ID: 32315175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using Selectively Scaled Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Assess Ligand Poses in RNA Aptamers.
    Liu Y; Frank AT
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Sep; 18(9):5703-5709. PubMed ID: 35926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
    Chiu SH; Xie L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple Ligand Unbinding Pathways and Ligand-Induced Destabilization Revealed by WExplore.
    Dickson A; Lotz SD
    Biophys J; 2017 Feb; 112(4):620-629. PubMed ID: 28256222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Data-driven classification of ligand unbinding pathways.
    Ray D; Parrinello M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(10):e2313542121. PubMed ID: 38412121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of protein-ligand binding.
    Negami T; Shimizu K; Terada T
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Sep; 35(25):1835-45. PubMed ID: 25043724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Steered molecular dynamics for studying ligand unbinding of ecdysone receptor.
    Hu X; Hu S; Wang J; Dong Y; Zhang L; Dong Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Nov; 36(14):3819-3828. PubMed ID: 29182104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models.
    Plattner N; Noé F
    Nat Commun; 2015 Jul; 6():7653. PubMed ID: 26134632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of protein-ligand affinity prediction using steered molecular dynamics simulations.
    Okimoto N; Suenaga A; Taiji M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Nov; 35(15):3221-3231. PubMed ID: 27771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Baseline Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Unbinding Kinetics through Machine Learning.
    Amangeldiuly N; Karlov D; Fedorov MV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):5946-5956. PubMed ID: 33183000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Receptor rigidity and ligand mobility in trypsin-ligand complexes.
    Guvench O; Price DJ; Brooks CL
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):407-17. PubMed ID: 15578663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations.
    Mollica L; Decherchi S; Zia SR; Gaspari R; Cavalli A; Rocchia W
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11539. PubMed ID: 26103621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New approaches for computing ligand-receptor binding kinetics.
    Bruce NJ; Ganotra GK; Kokh DB; Sadiq SK; Wade RC
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 49():1-10. PubMed ID: 29132080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unbiased Molecular Dynamics of 11 min Timescale Drug Unbinding Reveals Transition State Stabilizing Interactions.
    Lotz SD; Dickson A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2018 Jan; 140(2):618-628. PubMed ID: 29303257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Water access and ligand dissociation at the binding site of proteins.
    Yonetani Y
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Nov; 149(17):175102. PubMed ID: 30408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Understanding the differences of the ligand binding/unbinding pathways between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated ARH1 using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Zhu J; Lv Y; Han X; Xu D; Han W
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12439. PubMed ID: 28963484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temperature Accelerated Sliced Sampling to Probe Ligand Dissociation from Protein.
    Tripathi S; Nair NN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Aug; 63(16):5182-5191. PubMed ID: 37540828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forces and energetics of hapten-antibody dissociation: a biased molecular dynamics simulation study.
    Paci E; Caflisch A; Plückthun A; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 314(3):589-605. PubMed ID: 11846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using robotics to fold proteins and dock ligands.
    Brutlag D; Apaydin S; Guestrin C; Hsu D; Varma C; Singh A; Latombe JC
    Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S74. PubMed ID: 12385986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.