BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37005145)

  • 1. Histopathologically Validated Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT in the Primary and Secondary Staging of Prostate Cancer and the Impact of PSMA-PET/CT on Clinical Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Jeet V; Parkinson B; Song R; Sharma R; Hoyle M
    Semin Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 53(5):706-718. PubMed ID: 37005145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
    Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracy of
    Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of
    Ling SW; de Jong AC; Schoots IG; Nasserinejad K; Busstra MB; van der Veldt AAM; Brabander T
    Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 33():61-71. PubMed ID: 34632423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of
    Liu X; Wang Q; Zhang B; Jiang T; Zeng W
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 35388806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
    Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
    Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
    Bukavina L; Luckenbaugh AN; Hofman MS; Hope T; Kamran SC; Murphy DG; Yamoah K; Ost P
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jun; 83(6):521-533. PubMed ID: 36404204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node staging with fluorine-18 prostate specific membrane antigen 1007-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer using histopathological evaluation of extended pelvic node dissection as reference.
    Hermsen R; Wedick EBC; Vinken MJM; van Kalmthout LWM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Wijers CHW; Somford DM; van Basten JA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3929-3937. PubMed ID: 35543733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lv Z; Song L; Wang M; Hou H; Li H; Wang X; Wang J; Wang J; Liu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2024 Apr; 137(8):949-958. PubMed ID: 37690993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ga-68-HBED-CC-PSMA-Ligand-PET/CT before Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
    Jilg CA; Drendel V; Rischke HC; Beck T; Vach W; Schaal K; Wetterauer U; Schultze-Seemann W; Meyer PT
    Theranostics; 2017; 7(6):1770-1780. PubMed ID: 28529650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
    Mattana F; Muraglia L; Rajwa P; Zattoni F; Marra G; Chiu PKF; Heidegger I; Kasivisvanathan V; Kesch CV; Olivier J; Preisser F; Thibault C; Valerio M; van den Bergh RCN; Gandaglia G; Ceci F;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.