BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37005486)

  • 1. Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420).
    Gareth Evans D; McWilliams L; Astley S; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Dobrashian R; Duffy SW; Gorman LS; Harkness EF; Harrison F; Harvie M; Jerrison A; Machin M; Maxwell AJ; Howell SJ; Wright SJ; Payne K; Qureshi N; Ruane H; Southworth J; Fox L; Bowers S; Hutchinson G; Thorpe E; Ulph F; Woof V; Howell A; French DP
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Jun; 128(11):2063-2071. PubMed ID: 37005486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).
    French DP; Astley S; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Dobrashian R; Duffy SW; Gorman LS; Harkness EF; Harrison F; Harvie M; Howell A; Jerrison A; Machin M; Maxwell AJ; McWilliams L; Payne K; Qureshi N; Ruane H; Sampson S; Stavrinos P; Thorpe E; Ulph F; van Staa T; Woof V; Evans DG
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):570. PubMed ID: 32552763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).
    French DP; McWilliams L; Bowers S; Woof VG; Harrison F; Ruane H; Hendy A; Evans DG
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Apr; 128(8):1548-1558. PubMed ID: 36774447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants.
    Evans DGR; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Astley SM; Byers H; Sampson S; Southworth J; Stavrinos P; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 30941651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme.
    Hawkins R; McWilliams L; Ulph F; Evans DG; French DP
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1058. PubMed ID: 36224549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer risk in young women in the national breast screening programme: implications for applying NICE guidelines for additional screening and chemoprevention.
    Evans DG; Brentnall AR; Harvie M; Dawe S; Sergeant JC; Stavrinos P; Astley S; Wilson M; Ainsworth J; Cuzick J; Buchan I; Donnelly LS; Howell A
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2014 Oct; 7(10):993-1001. PubMed ID: 25047362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer risk assessment and risk distribution in 3,491 Slovenian women invited for screening at the age of 50; a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Jarm K; Zadnik V; Birk M; Vrhovec M; Hertl K; Klanecek Z; Studen A; Sval C; Krajc M
    Radiol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 57(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 37665745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction To: Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420).
    Gareth Evans D; McWilliams L; Astley S; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Dobrashian R; Duffy SW; Gorman LS; Harkness EF; Harrison F; Harvie M; Jerrison A; Machin M; Maxwell AJ; Howell SJ; Wright SJ; Payne K; Qureshi N; Ruane H; Southworth J; Fox L; Bowers S; Hutchinson G; Thorpe E; Ulph F; Woof V; Howell A; French DP
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Jun; 128(11):2140. PubMed ID: 37095186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer risk prediction using Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm with an 18-SNPs polygenic risk score in a European population with below-average breast cancer incidence.
    Oblak T; Škerl P; Narang BJ; Blagus R; Krajc M; Novaković S; Žgajnar J
    Breast; 2023 Dec; 72():103590. PubMed ID: 37857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the Cost of 3 Risk Prediction Strategies for Potential Use in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.
    Wright SJ; Eden M; Ruane H; Byers H; Evans DG; Harvie M; Howell SJ; Howell A; French D; Payne K
    MDM Policy Pract; 2023; 8(1):23814683231171363. PubMed ID: 37152662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer risk stratification in women of screening age: Incremental effects of adding mammographic density, polygenic risk, and a gene panel.
    Evans DGR; van Veen EM; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; Astley SM; Byers H; Woodward ER; Sampson S; Southworth J; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Newman WG; Cuzick J; Howell A
    Genet Med; 2022 Jul; 24(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 35426792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inclusion of Endogenous Plasma Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate and Mammographic Density in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer.
    Gabrielson M; Ubhayasekera KA; Acharya SR; Franko MA; Eriksson M; Bergquist J; Czene K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 31948996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral and psychological impact of returning breast density results to Latinas: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
    Patel BK; Ridgeway JL; Ghosh K; Rhodes DJ; Borah B; Jenkins S; Suman VJ; Norman A; Jewett M; Singh D; Vachon CM; Radecki Breitkopf C
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):744. PubMed ID: 31852492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing individual breast cancer risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: a new paradigm for cancer prevention.
    Evans DG; Warwick J; Astley SM; Stavrinos P; Sahin S; Ingham S; McBurney H; Eckersley B; Harvie M; Wilson M; Beetles U; Warren R; Hufton A; Sergeant JC; Newman WG; Buchan I; Cuzick J; Howell A
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2012 Jul; 5(7):943-51. PubMed ID: 22581816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening knowledge among Hungarian women: a cross-sectional study.
    Reményi Kissné D; Gede N; Szakács Z; Kiss I
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):69. PubMed ID: 33588813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer risk feedback to women in the UK NHS breast screening population.
    Evans DG; Donnelly LS; Harkness EF; Astley SM; Stavrinos P; Dawe S; Watterson D; Fox L; Sergeant JC; Ingham S; Harvie MN; Wilson M; Beetles U; Buchan I; Brentnall AR; French DP; Cuzick J; Howell A
    Br J Cancer; 2016 Apr; 114(9):1045-52. PubMed ID: 27022688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrated breast cancer risk assessment and management model based on fuzzy cognitive maps.
    Subramanian J; Karmegam A; Papageorgiou E; Papandrianos N; Vasukie A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Mar; 118(3):280-97. PubMed ID: 25697987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.