These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37005593)

  • 1. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
    Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm.
    Duran GS; Gökmen Ş; Topsakal KG; Görgülü S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 36648374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Ye H; Cheng Z; Ungvijanpunya N; Chen W; Cao L; Gou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37422630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
    Polizzi A; Leonardi R
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.
    Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33445758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.
    Jeon S; Lee KC
    Prog Orthod; 2021 May; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 34056670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images.
    Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.
    Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 33678623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
    Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
    Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks.
    Blum FMS; Möhlhenrich SC; Raith S; Pankert T; Peters F; Wolf M; Hölzle F; Modabber A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):2255-2265. PubMed ID: 37014502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.
    El-Dawlatly M; Attia KH; Abdelghaffar AY; Mostafa YA; Abd El-Ghafour M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 36894679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.