173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37006057)
1. Feature selection algorithm based on binary BAT algorithm and optimum path forest classifier for breast cancer detection using both echographic and elastographic mode ultrasound images.
Sasikala S; Ezhilarasi M; Arunkumar S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 37006057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Particle swarm optimization based fusion of ultrasound echographic and elastographic texture features for improved breast cancer detection.
Sasikala S; Bharathi M; Ezhilarasi M; Senthil S; Reddy MR
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):677-688. PubMed ID: 31161595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fusion of k-Gabor features from medio-lateral-oblique and craniocaudal view mammograms for improved breast cancer diagnosis.
Sasikala S; Ezhilarasi M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 30197344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experiments on the Feature Selection and Classiifcation of Ultrasound Elastography Images for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancers].
Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xiao Y
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 40(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 29792411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification Method via Efficiently Combining Texture and Morphological Features on Ultrasound Images.
Wei M; Du Y; Wu X; Su Q; Zhu J; Zheng L; Lv G; Zhuang J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5894010. PubMed ID: 33062038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated local binary pattern texture features for classification of breast tissue imaged by optical coherence microscopy.
Wan S; Lee HC; Huang X; Xu T; Xu T; Zeng X; Zhang Z; Sheikine Y; Connolly JL; Fujimoto JG; Zhou C
Med Image Anal; 2017 May; 38():104-116. PubMed ID: 28327449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of statistical, LBP, and multi-resolution analysis features for breast mass classification.
Reyad YA; Berbar MA; Hussain M
J Med Syst; 2014 Sep; 38(9):100. PubMed ID: 25037713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Tumor Classification in Ultrasound Images by Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Shallow LBP Feature.
Chen H; Ma M; Liu G; Wang Y; Jin Z; Liu C
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):932-946. PubMed ID: 36720840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests.
Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):709-727. PubMed ID: 28582938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods for texture analysis of QUS parametric images in the characterization of breast lesions.
Osapoetra LO; Chan W; Tran W; Kolios MC; Czarnota GJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244965. PubMed ID: 33382837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
