These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37006230)

  • 1. Comparison of four DNA extraction kits efficiency for 16SrDNA microbiota profiling of diverse human samples.
    Gall-David SL; Boudry G; Buffet-Bataillon S
    Future Sci OA; 2023 Jan; 9(1):FSO837. PubMed ID: 37006230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in faecal samples from foxes.
    Maksimov P; Schares G; Press S; Fröhlich A; Basso W; Herzig M; Conraths FJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2017 Apr; 237():83-93. PubMed ID: 28268038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of DNA extraction kits for molecular diagnosis of human Blastocystis subtypes from fecal samples.
    Yoshikawa H; Dogruman-Al F; Turk S; Kustimur S; Balaban N; Sultan N
    Parasitol Res; 2011 Oct; 109(4):1045-50. PubMed ID: 21499752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
    Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical Pretreatments Applied in Three Commercial Kits for the Extraction of High-Quality DNA from Activated Sewage Sludge.
    Vásquez C; Leyton-Carcaman B; Cid-Alda FP; Segovia I; Pinto F; Abanto M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Oct; 24(20):. PubMed ID: 37894923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of commercial DNA preparation kits for the detection of Brucellae in tissue using quantitative real-time PCR.
    Tomaso H; Kattar M; Eickhoff M; Wernery U; Al Dahouk S; Straube E; Neubauer H; Scholz HC
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Apr; 10():100. PubMed ID: 20403208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of DNA extraction methods on different sample matrices within the same terrestrial ecosystem.
    Galla G; Praeg N; Rzehak T; Sprecher E; Colla F; Seeber J; Illmer P; Hauffe HC
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8715. PubMed ID: 38622248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
    Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of six commercial plasma small RNA isolation kits using qRT-PCR and electrophoretic separation: higher recovery of microRNA following ultracentrifugation.
    Meerson A; Ploug T
    Biol Methods Protoc; 2016 Mar; 1(1):bpw003. PubMed ID: 32161781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.
    Seethalakshmi PS; Kumaresan TN; Vishnu Prasad Nair RU; Prathiviraj R; Seghal Kiran G; Selvin J
    Arch Microbiol; 2024 Jun; 206(7):314. PubMed ID: 38900289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the gut microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits.
    Baek C; Kim WJ; Moon J; Moon SY; Kim W; Hu HJ; Min J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264291. PubMed ID: 35271591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyprus Sausages' Bacterial Community Identification Through Metataxonomic Sequencing: Evaluation of the Impact of Different DNA Extraction Protocols on the Sausages' Microbial Diversity Representation.
    Kamilari E; Efthymiou M; Anagnostopoulos DA; Tsaltas D
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():662957. PubMed ID: 34079530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples.
    McOrist AL; Jackson M; Bird AR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Jul; 50(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 11997164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dairy farms: Selection and evaluation of different DNA extraction methods from bovine and buffaloes milk and colostrum for the establishment of a safe colostrum farm bank.
    Gamberale F; Pietrella G; Sala M; Scaramella P; Puccica S; Antognetti V; Arrigoni N; Ricchi M; Cersini A
    Microbiologyopen; 2019 Oct; 8(10):e875. PubMed ID: 31420952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell-Free Microbial DNA Analysis: Effects of Blood Plasma and Serum Quantity, Biobanking Protocols, and Isolation Kits.
    Nikitina D; Lukosevicius R; Tilinde D; Muskieta T; Hov JR; Melum E; Klovins J; Org E; Kiudelis G; Kupcinskas J; Skieceviciene J
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38416864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota.
    Li M; Gong J; Cottrill M; Yu H; de Lange C; Burton J; Topp E
    J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 12732417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of Clostridium botulinum group III in environmental samples from farms by real-time PCR using four commercial DNA extraction kits.
    Le Maréchal C; Fourour S; Ballan V; Rouxel S; Souillard R; Chemaly M
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):441. PubMed ID: 29973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
    Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing DNA Extraction from Pediatric Stool for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Use in Next-Generation Sequencing Applications.
    Ness TE; Meiwes L; Kay A; Mejia R; Lange C; Farhat M; Mandalakas A; DiNardo A
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Feb; 11(1):e0226922. PubMed ID: 36475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.
    Claassen S; du Toit E; Kaba M; Moodley C; Zar HJ; Nicol MP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Aug; 94(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 23684993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.