These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37006419)

  • 1. Multiple Schedules Facilitate Rapid Noncontingent Reinforcement Schedule Thinning.
    Kelley ME; Clark RJ; McGarry KM; Henry JE; Morgan AC; Gadaire DM; Sloman KN
    Behav Anal Pract; 2023 Mar; 16(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 37006419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
    Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures for determining and then modifying the extinction component of multiple schedules for destructive behavior.
    Miller SA; Fisher WW; Greer BD; Saini V; Keevy MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2022 Mar; 55(2):463-480. PubMed ID: 34897677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-administered and noncontingent nicotine enhance reinforced operant responding in rats: impact of nicotine dose and reinforcement schedule.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Feb; 190(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16847680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?
    Nevin JA; Smith LD; Roberts J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jul; 48(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 16812487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Thompson RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11317985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of synchronous and noncontingent stimulus delivery on task engagement.
    Hardesty EM; Lerman DC; Hardee JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Jun; 56(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 37077129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further Evaluation of the Use of Multiple Schedules for Behavior Maintained by Negative Reinforcement.
    Campos C; Leon Y; Sleiman A; Urcuyo B
    Behav Modif; 2017 Mar; 41(2):269-285. PubMed ID: 27680584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on an arbitrary response in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).
    Pfaller-Sadovsky N; Hurtado-Parrado C; Arnott G
    Behav Processes; 2022 Nov; 203():104770. PubMed ID: 36283576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 10885529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.
    Davison M; Sheldon L; Lobb B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16812161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brief report: Signals enhance the suppressive effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
    Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Christensen T; Boelter EW
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Mar; 40(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 19777331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the Efficacy of and Preference for Signaling Extinction in a Multiple Schedule.
    Odell AJ; Greer BD; Fuhrman AM; Hardee AM
    Behav Dev Bull; 2021 Oct; 26(2):43-61. PubMed ID: 34745411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nominally acceptable integrity failures negatively affect interventions involving intermittent reinforcement.
    Jones SH; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2022 Oct; 55(4):1109-1123. PubMed ID: 35822271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of Escape-Maintained Challenging Behavior Using Chained Schedules: An Evaluation of the Effects of Thinning Positive plus Negative Reinforcement During Functional Communication Training.
    Zangrillo AN; Fisher WW; Greer BD; Owen TM; DeSouza AA
    Int J Dev Disabil; 2016; 62(3):147-156. PubMed ID: 28626579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using multiple schedules during functional communication training to promote rapid transfer of treatment effects.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Fuhrman AM; Querim AC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):713-33. PubMed ID: 26384141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.