These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3700643)

  • 1. Genetic testing and exclusionary practices in the workplace.
    Uzych L
    J Public Health Policy; 1986; 7(1):37-57. PubMed ID: 3700643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic testing in employment situations. A question of worker rights.
    Diamond AL
    J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):231-56. PubMed ID: 6604120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
    Buss E
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive hazards in the workplace: some legal considerations.
    McElveen JC
    J Occup Med; 1986 Feb; 28(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 3950784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The exclusion of pregnant, pregnable, and once-pregnable people (a.k.a. women) from biomedical research.
    Merton V
    Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(4):369-451. PubMed ID: 7942864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers.
    Norz F
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right of the state to sterilize.
    Aronson SM
    Med Health R I; 2006 Jun; 89(6):193. PubMed ID: 16875003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent and abortion.
    Kapp MB
    Wis L Rev; 1993; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
    Andrade VM
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
    Taylor KA
    Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond Baby M: international perspectives on gestational surrogacy and the demise of the unitary biological mother.
    Krim TM
    Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):193-226. PubMed ID: 10184657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal versus maternal rights.
    Owens WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):666-7. PubMed ID: 7070740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women in the workplace: a legal perspective.
    Stillman NG
    J Occup Med; 1978 Sep; 20(9):605-9. PubMed ID: 702217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal protection policies: a method of safeguarding fetuses or a way of limiting women in the workplace?
    Hoffman H
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):193-207, 213, 224. PubMed ID: 10105492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What are the legal rights of the unborn child?
    Vernon J
    Neonatal Netw; 1997 Jun; 16(4):73-4. PubMed ID: 9216327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.