652 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37007095)
21. Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis in renal carcinoma.
Feng X; Hong T; Liu W; Xu C; Li W; Yang B; Song Y; Li T; Li W; Zhou H; Yin C
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1054358. PubMed ID: 36465636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of lung papillary adenocarcinoma-specific survival using ensemble machine learning models.
Xia K; Chen D; Jin S; Yi X; Luo L
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14827. PubMed ID: 37684259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.
Chen X; Pan J; Li Y; Tang R
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Nov; 35(11):2643-2656. PubMed ID: 37733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interpretable machine learning-based clinical prediction model for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Xie H; Hong T; Liu W; Jia X; Wang L; Zhang H; Xu C; Zhang X; Li WL; Wang Q; Yin C; Lv X
BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):137. PubMed ID: 38641789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Development of a Prediction Model Based on Random Survival Forest for the Postoperative Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.
Lin J; Yin M; Liu L; Gao J; Yu C; Liu X; Xu C; Zhu J
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36230593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine learning predictions of the adverse events of different treatments in patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Chen W; Liu J; Shi Y
Intern Emerg Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development and Validation of a DeepSurv Nomogram to Predict Survival Outcomes and Guide Personalized Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Yang B; Liu C; Wu R; Zhong J; Li A; Ma L; Zhong J; Yin S; Zhou C; Ge Y; Tao X; Zhang L; Lu G
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():895014. PubMed ID: 35814402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Machine learning models for predicting survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma.
Huang T; Huang L; Yang R; Li S; He N; Feng A; Li L; Lyu J
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs; 2022 Dec; 9(12):100141. PubMed ID: 36276885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of deep learning-based recurrence-free survival with random survival forest and Cox proportional hazard models in Stage-I NSCLC patients.
Kar İ; Kocaman G; İbrahimov F; Enön S; Coşgun E; Elhan AH
Cancer Med; 2023 Sep; 12(18):19272-19278. PubMed ID: 37644818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Application value of machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence after resection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma].
Ji GW; Wang K; Xia YX; Li XC; Wang XH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 59(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 34192861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality for acute coronary syndrome
Hadanny A; Shouval R; Wu J; Gale CP; Unger R; Zahger D; Gottlieb S; Matetzky S; Goldenberg I; Beigel R; Iakobishvili Z
J Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 34857429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock.
Rong F; Xiang H; Qian L; Xue Y; Ji K; Yin R
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():849688. PubMed ID: 35600489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Machine Learning Predict Survivals of Spinal and Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma with the SEER Database.
Fan G; Yang S; Qin J; Huang L; Li Y; Liu H; Liao X
Global Spine J; 2024 May; 14(4):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 36281905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Survival analysis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection based on CoxPH model and deep learning algorithm].
Chen JL; Yu XP; Tang Y; Chen C; Qiu YH; Wu H; Song TQ; He Y; Mao XH; Zhai WL; Cheng ZJ; Li JD; Geng ZM; Tang ZH; Quan ZW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 61(4):313-320. PubMed ID: 36822588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Machine Learning-Based Individualized Survival Prediction Model for Total Knee Replacement in Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Jamshidi A; Pelletier JP; Labbe A; Abram F; Martel-Pelletier J; Droit A
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2021 Oct; 73(10):1518-1527. PubMed ID: 33749148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of machine learning prognostic models for overall survival of prostate cancer patients with lymph node-positive.
Peng ZH; Tian JH; Chen BH; Zhou HB; Bi H; He MX; Li MR; Zheng XY; Wang YW; Chong T; Li ZL
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18424. PubMed ID: 37891423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning algorithms: A study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.
Kim SI; Kang JW; Eun YG; Lee YC
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():974678. PubMed ID: 36072804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A deep learning algorithm with good prediction efficacy for cancer-specific survival in osteosarcoma: A retrospective study.
Liu Y; Xie L; Wang D; Xia K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0286841. PubMed ID: 37768965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
