These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37007718)

  • 1. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap vs Complete Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes in Nonposturing Surgery.
    Rahman R; Sarfraz MW; El-Wardani M
    J Vitreoretin Dis; 2022; 6(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 37007718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. VISUAL OUTCOMES AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS FLAP IN THE CLOSURE OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES.
    Suarez MK; Wang SK; Hayes B; Greven MA; Shah RE; Greven C; Russell G; Ong SS
    Retina; 2024 Jul; 44(7):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 38437847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study.
    Ramtohul P; Parrat E; Denis D; Lorenzi U
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31907015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Yu JG; Wang J; Xiang Y
    Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(5):713-722. PubMed ID: 33596577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.
    Rizzo S; Tartaro R; Barca F; Caporossi T; Bacherini D; Giansanti F
    Retina; 2018 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S73-S78. PubMed ID: 29232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of 1 DD and 2 DD radius conventional internal limiting membrane peeling in large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sinawat S; Srihatrai P; Sutra P; Yospaiboon Y; Sinawat S
    Eye (Lond); 2021 Sep; 35(9):2506-2513. PubMed ID: 33159177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment of Large Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Holes.
    Sinawat S; Jumpawong S; Ratanapakorn T; Bhoomibunchoo C; Yospaiboon Y; Sinawat S
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():521-529. PubMed ID: 33603330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.
    Kannan NB; Kohli P; Parida H; Adenuga OO; Ramasamy K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):177. PubMed ID: 30029621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen Y; Lin X; Zhang L; Wu M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 31914954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique.
    Bottoni F; Parrulli S; Mete M; D'Agostino I; Cereda M; Cigada M; Maggio E; Maraone G; Iacovello D; Bottega E; Staurenghi G; Pertile G
    Ophthalmologica; 2020; 243(5):334-341. PubMed ID: 31940651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. INFLUENCE OF INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE ON THE OUTER RETINAL LAYER STRUCTURES AFTER A LARGE MACULAR HOLE SURGERY.
    Iwasaki M; Kinoshita T; Miyamoto H; Imaizumi H
    Retina; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 29863535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique.
    Yan Y; Zhao T; Sun C; Zhao H; Jia X; Wang Z
    Adv Ther; 2021 Apr; 38(4):1931-1945. PubMed ID: 33689136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Three Different Techniques of Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap in Treatment of Large Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole.
    Ghassemi F; Khojasteh H; Khodabande A; Dalvin LA; Mazloumi M; Riazi-Esfahani H; Mirghorbani M
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():2599-2606. PubMed ID: 31920283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).
    Spiteri Cornish K; Lois N; Scott N; Burr J; Cook J; Boachie C; Tadayoni R; la Cour M; Christensen U; Kwok A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; (6):CD009306. PubMed ID: 23740611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Yuan J; Zhang LL; Lu YJ; Han MY; Yu AH; Cai XJ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 29179705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical Management of Full-Thickness Macular Holes Spontaneously Arising From Lamellar Macular Holes.
    Garg A; Wahab C; Yan P
    J Vitreoretin Dis; 2024; 8(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 38223778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR VERY LARGE MACULAR HOLES.
    Narayanan R; Singh SR; Taylor S; Berrocal MH; Chhablani J; Tyagi M; Ohno-Matsui K; Pappuru RR; Apte RS
    Retina; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1465-1469. PubMed ID: 29689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy.
    Iwasaki M; Miyamoto H; Okushiba U; Imaizumi H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 31686266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy.
    Xin WJ; Jiang JZ; Ji LB; Lv WJ; Gu YX; Xiao Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 260(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34309768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy.
    Lin JP; Yang CM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 260(2):489-496. PubMed ID: 34477928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.