These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3700864)

  • 1. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK; Gopal HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss.
    McCaffrey HA; Sussman HM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 7967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic correlates of the front/back vowel distinction: a comparison of transition onset versus "steady state".
    Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 2380450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels.
    Traunmüller H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1465-75. PubMed ID: 7240581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory normalization of French vowels synthesized by an articulatory model simulating growth from birth to adulthood.
    Ménard L; Schwartz JL; Boë LJ; Kandel S; Vallée N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1892-905. PubMed ID: 12002872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of back vowels: effects of varying F1 - F0 Bark distance.
    Fahey RP; Diehl RL; Traunmüller H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2350-7. PubMed ID: 8730081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246645. PubMed ID: 33600430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of vowel height: the role of F1-F0 distance.
    Hoemeke KA; Diehl RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):661-74. PubMed ID: 7930066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel.
    Miller JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2114-34. PubMed ID: 2659639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multidimensional scaling study of esophageal vowels.
    Fox RA; Trudeau MD
    Phonetica; 1988; 45(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 3237777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys.
    Sinnott JM; Brown CH; Malik WT; Kressley RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1214-24. PubMed ID: 9401456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speaker normalization of static and dynamic vowel spectral features.
    Zahorian SA; Jagharghi AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels.
    Liénard JS; Di Benedetto MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):411-22. PubMed ID: 10420631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Hebrew vowel system: raw and normalized acoustic data.
    Most T; Amir O; Tobin Y
    Lang Speech; 2000; 43(Pt 3):295-308. PubMed ID: 11216297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.
    Kewley-Port D; Atal BS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 2708689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolving theories of vowel perception.
    Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2081-7. PubMed ID: 2659637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English.
    Fourakis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1816-27. PubMed ID: 1960277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.