181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37009540)
1. Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.
Hua HU; Rayess N; Li AS; Do D; Rahimy E
J Vitreoretin Dis; 2022; 6(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 37009540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections.
Rayess N; Li AS; Do DV; Rahimy E
Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Dec; 4(12):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 32497854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Kloosterboer A; Yannuzzi N; Topilow N; Patel N; Kuriyan A; Sridhar J
Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 36(5-6):400-405. PubMed ID: 33646928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of Trustworthiness and Readability of English and Spanish Hypo- and Hyperthyroid-Related Online Patient Education Information.
Parikh C; Ostrovsky AM
J Patient Exp; 2023; 10():23743735231179063. PubMed ID: 37323756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Third Molars on the Internet: A Guide for Assessing Information Quality and Readability.
Hanna K; Brennan D; Sambrook P; Armfield J
Interact J Med Res; 2015 Oct; 4(4):e19. PubMed ID: 26443470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
Özduran E; Hanci V
Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.
Eleiwa TK; Dihan QA; Brown AD; Zaldivar AT; Abdelnaem SE; Sallam AB; Phillips PH; Elnahry AG; Elhusseiny AM
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38815099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality and readability assessment of online patient information on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Hoeltzel GD; Miura JT; Aarons CB; Williams NN; Dumon KR; Karakousis GC
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 36394434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
