242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37010099)
1. Glycemic patterns and impact of early hyperglycaemia in patients with cardiogenic shock on mechanical circulatory support.
Nair RM; Chawla S; Mentias A; Saleem T; Vural A; Ko T; Rampersad P; Cremer P; Menon V
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2023 May; 12(5):328-335. PubMed ID: 37010099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock on Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Nair RM; Kumar S; Saleem T; Lee R; Higgins A; Khot UN; Reed GW; Menon V
Am J Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 217():119-126. PubMed ID: 38382702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of mechanical circulatory support-related complications in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Takahashi K; Kubo S; Ikuta A; Osakada K; Takamatsu M; Taguchi Y; Ohya M; Shimada T; Miura K; Tada T; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Kadota K
J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 79(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 34511239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock in Japan, 2010 to 2020 (from a Nationwide Inpatient Database Study).
Nishimoto Y; Ohbe H; Matsui H; Nakata J; Takiguchi T; Nakajima M; Sasabuchi Y; Sato Y; Watanabe T; Yamada T; Fukunami M; Yasunaga H
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 203():203-211. PubMed ID: 37499600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock.
Shibasaki I; Masawa T; Abe S; Ogawa H; Takei Y; Tezuka M; Seki M; Kato T; Watanabe R; Koshiji N; Saitou S; Ogata K; Haruyama Y; Toyoda S; Fukuda H
J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 80(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 35288000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.
Zhang Q; Han Y; Sun S; Zhang C; Liu H; Wang B; Wei S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35152887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan.
Nishimoto Y; Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Sakakura K; Kawai T; Kikuchi A; Watanabe T; Yamada T; Fukunami M; Yamaji K; Ishii H; Amano T; Kozuma K;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Dec; 12(23):e031838. PubMed ID: 38038195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support Used Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock From ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Del Rio-Pertuz G; Benjanuwattra J; Juarez M; Mekraksakit P; Argueta-Sosa E; Ansari MM
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Sep; 42():74-83. PubMed ID: 35570152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock due to ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of the National Readmissions Database.
Briasoulis A; Kampaktsis P; Emfietzoglou M; Kuno T; Van den Eynde J; Ntalianis A; Duque ER; Malik AH
Angiology; 2023 Jan; 74(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 35440216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical circulatory support for early surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock.
Vondran M; Wehbe MS; Etz C; Ghazy T; Rastan AJ; Borger MA; Schroeter T
Artif Organs; 2021 Mar; 45(3):244-253. PubMed ID: 32857884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.
Varshney AS; Berg DD; Katz JN; Baird-Zars VM; Bohula EA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Guo J; Lawler PR; Nativi-Nicolau J; Sinha SS; Teuteberg JJ; van Diepen S; Morrow DA;
JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 5(6):703-708. PubMed ID: 32293644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types.
Movahed MR; Talle A; Hashemzadeh M
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 Jul; 39(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 38555535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
