These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37010307)

  • 21. Saccade latencies during a preferential looking task and objective scoring of grating acuity in children with and without visual impairments.
    Barsingerhorn AD; Boonstra FN; Goossens J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):616-625. PubMed ID: 30734501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring visual acuity in infants.
    Fulton AB; Hansen RM; Manning KA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1981; 25(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 7221878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between grating acuity measured by visual tracking and preferential looking in infants.
    Lengyel D; Gottlob I
    Strabismus; 2003 Jun; 11(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 12854016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Cardiff Test: a new visual acuity test for toddlers and children with intellectual impairment. A preliminary report.
    Adoh TO; Woodhouse JM; Oduwaiye KA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 1641223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Too Many Shades of Grey: Photometrically and Spectrally Mismatched Targets and Backgrounds in Printed Acuity Tests for Infants and Young Children.
    Vivas-Mateos G; Livingstone IAT; Hamilton R; Cheema A; Giardini ME
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 9(12):12. PubMed ID: 33240565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Criteria for monocular acuity deficit in infancy and early childhood.
    Birch EE; Hale LA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Apr; 29(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 3356518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vernier acuity cards: a practical method for measuring vernier acuity in infants.
    Holmes JM; Archer SM
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1993; 30(5):312-4. PubMed ID: 8254447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evaluation of visual acuity of small children with preferential looking methods].
    Kubatko-Zielińska A; Krzystkowa KM; Pociej-Zero M
    Klin Oczna; 1993 May; 95(5):180-2. PubMed ID: 8246401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel computerized visual acuity test for children.
    Shin YJ; Lee IB; Wee WR; Lee JH; Hwang JM
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 23730112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgment in the diagnosis of amblyopia with strabismus.
    Ellis GS; Hartmann EE; Love A; May JG; Morgan KS
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Jun; 95(6):788-91. PubMed ID: 3062530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of visual acuity in infancy and early childhood.
    Atkinson J; Braddick O
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl; 1983; 157():18-26. PubMed ID: 6305094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The predictive utility of the Teller acuity cards for assessing visual outcome in children with preterm birth and associated perinatal risks.
    Hall HL; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(15):2067-76. PubMed ID: 10828473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of acuity in human infants using face and grating stimuli.
    Harris SJ; Hansen RM; Fulton AB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Jul; 25(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 6735642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Refractive error and preferential looking visual acuity in infants 12-24 months of age: year 2 of a longitudinal study.
    Kohl P; Samek M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Sep; 59(9):686-90. PubMed ID: 3183283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective estimation of visual acuity with preferential looking.
    Sturm V; Cassel D; Eizenman M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 52(2):708-13. PubMed ID: 20861485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preferential looking acuity obtained with a staircase procedure in pediatric patients.
    Mayer DL; Fulton AB; Hansen RM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Oct; 23(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 7118510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quick assessment of preferential looking acuity in infants.
    Gwiazda J; Wolfe JM; Brill S; Mohindra I; Held R
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Jul; 57(7):420-7. PubMed ID: 7406010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the acuity card procedure for assessment of infants with ocular disorders.
    Preston KL; McDonald M; Sebris SL; Dobson V; Teller DY
    Ophthalmology; 1987 Jun; 94(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 3627713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vernier acuity cards: examination of development and screening validity.
    Drover JR; Morale SE; Wang YZ; Stager DR; Birch EE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Nov; 87(11):E806-12. PubMed ID: 20871472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.