BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37010685)

  • 1. Fuelling the sustainable future: a comparative analysis between battery electrical vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electrical vehicles (FCEV).
    Parikh A; Shah M; Prajapati M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(20):57236-57252. PubMed ID: 37010685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficient operating parameter estimation for a simulated plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.
    Singh KV; Khandelwal R; Bansal HO; Singh D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(12):18126-18141. PubMed ID: 34676482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.
    Elgowainy A; Han J; Ward J; Joseck F; Gohlke D; Lindauer A; Ramsden T; Biddy M; Alexander M; Barnhart S; Sutherland I; Verduzco L; Wallington TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):2392-2399. PubMed ID: 29298387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.
    Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Transport in Line with the 2 °C Target.
    Zhu Y; Skerlos S; Xu M; Cooper DR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):9326-9338. PubMed ID: 34106694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fuel cell-based electric vehicles technologies and challenges.
    Selmi T; Khadhraoui A; Cherif A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):78121-78131. PubMed ID: 36173525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution caused by light and heavy duty vehicles with battery-electric, fuel cell-electric and catenary trucks.
    Breuer JL; Samsun RC; Stolten D; Peters R
    Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106474. PubMed ID: 33711760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extensive review on hybrid electric vehicles powered by fuel cell-enabled hybrid energy storage system.
    Shekhawat M; Bansal HO
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(57):119750-119771. PubMed ID: 37973779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exponential adoption of battery electric cars.
    Jung F; Schröder M; Timme M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295692. PubMed ID: 38079411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
    Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.
    Luk JM; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8215-8228. PubMed ID: 28714678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route.
    Chakraborty P; Parker R; Hoque T; Cruz J; Du L; Wang S; Bhunia S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):5588. PubMed ID: 35379831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Review on Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Anatomy, Technology Evolution and Policy Drivers towards EVs and FCEVs Market Propagation.
    Chandran M; Palanisamy K; Benson D; Sundaram S
    Chem Rec; 2022 Feb; 22(2):e202100235. PubMed ID: 34796621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
    Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional Heterogeneity in the Emissions Benefits of Electrified and Lightweighted Light-Duty Vehicles.
    Wu D; Guo F; Field FR; De Kleine RD; Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Kirchain RE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 53(18):10560-10570. PubMed ID: 31336049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Zero-Emission Plug-In Battery Electric Vehicle Technology for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Trucks.
    Liu X; Elgowainy A; Vijayagopal R; Wang M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):538-546. PubMed ID: 33356189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative water footprint assessment of fuel cell electric vehicles and compressed natural gas vehicles.
    Yao D; Liu Y; Xu Z; Zhu Z; Qi J; Wang Y; Cui P
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 830():154820. PubMed ID: 35341846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Study on the Routing Problem of Electric and Fuel Vehicles Considering Carbon Trading.
    Liao W; Liu L; Fu J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(17):. PubMed ID: 31461949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact assessment of crude oil mix, electricity generation mix, and vehicle technology on road freight emission reduction in China.
    Jiang Z; Yan R; Gong Z; Guan G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27763-27781. PubMed ID: 36385332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Life cycle assessment of mobility options using wood based fuels--comparison of selected environmental effects and costs.
    Weinberg J; Kaltschmitt M
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():420-8. PubMed ID: 24012134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.