BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37011059)

  • 1. Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study.
    Burghgraef TA; Hol JC; Rutgers ML; Brown G; Hompes R; Sietses C; Consten ECJ;
    BJS Open; 2023 Mar; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 37011059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the sigmoid take-off with other definitions of the rectosigmoid junction: A retrospective comparative cohort analysis.
    Li F; Wang B; Lu S; Wang Y; Sun T; Wang H; Zhou X; Fu W
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():168-174. PubMed ID: 32650119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sigmoid take-off in rectosigmoid cancer as a landmark identifying benefit from neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Li F; Qu R; Meng Y; Li N; Chen M; Wang H; Zhou X; Fu W
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Oct; 46(10):4330-4336. PubMed ID: 37803809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pelvic CT in addition to MRI to differentiate between rectal and sigmoid cancer on imaging using the sigmoid take-off as a landmark.
    Bogveradze N; Maas M; El Khababi N; Schurink NW; Lahaye MJ; Bakers FC; Tanis PJ; Kusters M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Feb; 64(2):467-472. PubMed ID: 35404168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The sigmoid take-off: An anatomical imaging definition of the rectum validated on specimen analysis.
    D'Souza N; Lord A; Shaw A; Patel A; Balyasnikova S; Tudyka V; Abulafi M; Moran B; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Terlizzo M; West N; Quirke P; Brown G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1668-1672. PubMed ID: 32061459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sigmoid take-off as a landmark to distinguish rectal from sigmoid tumours on MRI: Reproducibility, pitfalls and potential impact on treatment stratification.
    Bogveradze N; Lambregts DMJ; El Khababi N; Dresen RC; Maas M; Kusters M; Tanis PJ; Beets-Tan RGH;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):237-244. PubMed ID: 34583878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic factors and patterns of failure after surgery for T4 rectal cancer in the beyond total mesorectal excision era.
    Peacock O; Waters PS; Bressel M; Lynch AC; Wakeman C; Eglinton T; Koh CE; Lee PJ; Austin KK; Warrier SK; Solomon MJ; Frizelle FA; Heriot AG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Nov; 106(12):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 31339561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a multidisciplinary training programme on outcome of upper rectal cancer by critical appraisal of the extent of mesorectal excision with postoperative MRI.
    Bondeven P; Laurberg S; Hagemann-Madsen RH; Pedersen BG
    BJS Open; 2020 Apr; 4(2):274-283. PubMed ID: 32207568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective approach for upper rectal cancer treatment: total mesorectal excision and preoperative chemoradiation are seldom necessary.
    Marinello FG; Frasson M; Baguena G; Flor-Lorente B; Cervantes A; Roselló S; Espí A; García-Granero E
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jun; 58(6):556-65. PubMed ID: 25944427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excision of the seminal vesicles for locally advanced and recurrent rectal and sigmoid cancer.
    Keating JP; Manning S; Dennett E; Studd R
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Sep; 87(9):688-691. PubMed ID: 25827193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SPONGE-assisted versus Trendelenburg position surgery in laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery (SPONGE trial): randomized clinical trial.
    Fahim M; Couwenberg A; Verweij ME; Dijksman LM; Verkooijen HM; Smits AB
    Br J Surg; 2022 Oct; 109(11):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 35909251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study.
    Detering R; van Oostendorp SE; Meyer VM; van Dieren S; Bos ACRK; Dekker JWT; Reerink O; van Waesberghe JHTM; Marijnen CAM; Moons LMG; Beets-Tan RGH; Hompes R; van Westreenen HL; Tanis PJ; Tuynman JB;
    Br J Surg; 2020 Sep; 107(10):1372-1382. PubMed ID: 32297326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The rectosigmoid problem.
    D'Souza N; de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; Lord A; Shaw A; Abulafi M; Tekkis P; Wiggers T; Brown G
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):521-525. PubMed ID: 30217314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The treatment of all MRI-defined low rectal cancers in a single expert centre over a 5-year period: is there room for improvement?
    Kusters M; Slater A; Betts M; Hompes R; Guy RJ; Jones OM; George BD; Lindsey I; Mortensen NJ; James DR; Cunningham C
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):O397-O404. PubMed ID: 27313145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of rectal perforation on recurrence during rectal cancer surgery in a national population registry.
    Jörgren F; Lydrup ML; Buchwald P
    Br J Surg; 2020 Dec; 107(13):1818-1825. PubMed ID: 32484249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
    Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing outcomes of robotic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Flynn J; Patil S; Widmar M; Quezada-Diaz F; Lynn P; Strombom P; Temple L; Smith JJ; Wei IH; Pappou EP; Guillem JG; Paty PP; Nash GM; Weiser MR; Garcia-Aguilar J
    BJS Open; 2021 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 35040943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical and oncological outcomes of upper rectal, rectosigmoid and sigmoid tumours.
    Morarasu S; O'Brien L; Clancy C; Dietrich D; Maurer CA; Frasson M; Garcia-Granero E; Martin ST
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 47(9):2421-2428. PubMed ID: 34016500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it time to rethink the rule of total mesorectal excision? A prospective radiological and pathological study in 49 consecutive patients with mid-rectal cancer.
    Guedj N; Zappa M; Maggiori L; Bertin C; Hennequin C; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Sep; 18(9):O314-21. PubMed ID: 27381492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved outcomes for rectal cancer in the era of preoperative chemoradiation and tailored mesorectal excision: a series of 338 consecutive cases.
    Pacelli F; Sanchez AM; Covino M; Tortorelli AP; Bossola M; Valentini V; Gambacorta MA; Doglietto GB
    Am Surg; 2013 Feb; 79(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 23336654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.