127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37011398)
1. After PSA screening, MRI-targeted vs. systematic biopsy detected fewer clinically insignificant prostate cancers.
Hoffman RM
Ann Intern Med; 2023 Apr; 176(4):JC44. PubMed ID: 37011398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Jonas Hugosson, Marianne Månsson, Jona Wallström, et al. Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only. N Engl J Med 2022;387:2126-37.
Morote J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):234. PubMed ID: 36894492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Jonas Hugosson, Marianne Månsson, Jona Wallström, et al. Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only. N Engl J Med 2022;387:2126-37.
Lenfant L; Mozer P; Seisen T
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):235. PubMed ID: 36707321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Kohestani K; Månsson M; Arnsrud Godtman R; Stranne J; Wallström J; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 33612068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.
Hugosson J; Månsson M; Wallström J; Axcrona U; Carlsson SV; Egevad L; Geterud K; Khatami A; Kohestani K; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Stranne J; Godtman RA; Hellström M;
N Engl J Med; 2022 Dec; 387(23):2126-2137. PubMed ID: 36477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening.
Eklund M; Jäderling F; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Annerstedt M; Aly M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Grönberg H; Nordström T;
N Engl J Med; 2021 Sep; 385(10):908-920. PubMed ID: 34237810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.
Boschheidgen M; Albers P; Schlemmer HP; Hellms S; Bonekamp D; Sauter A; Hadaschik B; Krilaviciute A; Radtke JP; Seibold P; Lakes J; Arsov C; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K; Makowski M; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Harke N; Debus J; Körber SA; Benner A; Kristiansen G; Giesel FL; Antoch G; Kaaks R; Becker N; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2024 Feb; 85(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37863727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate MRI versus PSA screening for prostate cancer detection (the MVP Study): a randomised clinical trial.
Nam R; Patel C; Milot L; Hird A; Wallis C; Macinnis P; Singh M; Emmenegger U; Sherman C; Haider MA
BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e059482. PubMed ID: 36351725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Miss Clinically Significant Cancer?
Williams C; Ahdoot M; Daneshvar MA; Hague C; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Shih J; Khondakar N; Yerram N; Mehralivand S; Gurram S; Siddiqui M; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Merino M; Wood B; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 34433302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of MRI targeted prostate biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with low prostate-specific antigen levels.
Bang S; Yu J; Chung JH; Song W; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Jeon SS
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21951. PubMed ID: 34753938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Targeted Prostate Biopsy and MR-Guided Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1096():159-184. PubMed ID: 30324353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness of the Stockholm3 Test and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Study.
Hao S; Heintz E; Östensson E; Discacciati A; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Clements MS
Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 35094896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
