194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37011632)
21. Dose-averaged LET calculation for proton track segments using microdosimetric Monte Carlo simulations.
Bertolet A; Baratto-Roldán A; Barbieri S; Baiocco G; Carabe A; Cortés-Giraldo MA
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4184-4192. PubMed ID: 31169910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Linear energy transfer dependence of a normoxic polymer gel dosimeter investigated using proton beam absorbed dose measurements.
Gustavsson H; Bäck SA; Medin J; Grusell E; Olsson LE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3847-55. PubMed ID: 15470909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose- rather than fluence-averaged LET should be used as a single-parameter descriptor of proton beam quality for radiochromic film dosimetry.
Resch AF; Heyes PD; Fuchs H; Bassler N; Georg D; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 32166764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detailed Monte-Carlo characterization of a Faraday cup for proton therapy.
Ehwald J; Togno M; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Safai S; Winterhalter C
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5828-5841. PubMed ID: 37227735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the dosimetric properties of a diode detector for small field proton radiosurgery.
McAuley GA; Teran AV; Slater JD; Slater JM; Wroe AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):51-64. PubMed ID: 26699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Monte Carlo study for the calculation of the average linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for a clinical proton beam line and a radiobiological carbon ion beam line.
Romano F; Cirrone GA; Cuttone G; Rosa FD; Mazzaglia SE; Petrovic I; Fira AR; Varisano A
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):2863-82. PubMed ID: 24828462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Double scattering and pencil beam scanning Monte Carlo workflows for proton therapy retrospective studies on radiation-induced toxicities.
Leite AMM; Bonfrate A; Da Fonseca A; Lansonneur P; Alapetite C; Mammar H; De Marzi L
Cancer Radiother; 2023 Jun; 27(4):319-327. PubMed ID: 37164897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments.
Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek N; Ehlert J; Prasad R; Wulff J; Lühr A; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):666-674. PubMed ID: 34855985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Towards precise LET measurements based on energy deposition of therapeutic ions in Timepix3 detectors.
Félix-Bautista R; Hamad Y; Yáñez-González T; Ochoa-Parra P; Granja C; Martišíková M; Mairani A; Gehrke T
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 69(12):. PubMed ID: 38815613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensitivity correction of fluorescent nuclear track detectors using alpha particles: Determining LET spectra of light ions with enhanced accuracy.
Muñoz ID; Burigo LN; Gehrke T; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2385-2401. PubMed ID: 36345603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Elevated LET components in clinical proton beams.
Grassberger C; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(20):6677-91. PubMed ID: 21965268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analytical linear energy transfer model including secondary particles: calculations along the central axis of the proton pencil beam.
Marsolat F; De Marzi L; Pouzoulet F; Mazal A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):740-57. PubMed ID: 26732530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness approach for proton therapy based on an improved description of the mixed radiation field.
Mairani A; Dokic I; Magro G; Tessonnier T; Bauer J; Böhlen TT; Ciocca M; Ferrari A; Sala PR; Jäkel O; Debus J; Haberer T; Abdollahi A; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1378-1395. PubMed ID: 28114106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is the dose-averaged LET a reliable predictor for the relative biological effectiveness?
Grün R; Friedrich T; Traneus E; Scholz M
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 30565705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF SPATIAL LET DISTRIBUTIONS IN CLINICAL PROTON BEAMS.
Grzanka L; Ardenfors O; Bassler N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Aug; 180(1-4):296-299. PubMed ID: 29378068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Determination of the proton LET using thin film solar cells coated with scintillating powder.
Jeong S; Kim C; An S; Kwon YC; Pak SI; Cheon W; Shin D; Lim Y; Jeong JH; Kim H; Lee SB
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1194-1204. PubMed ID: 36135795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microdosimetric measurements of a clinical proton beam with micrometer-sized solid-state detector.
Anderson SE; Furutani KM; Tran LT; Chartier L; Petasecca M; Lerch M; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard M; Perevertaylo VL; Rosenfeld AB; Herman MG; Beltran C
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):6029-6037. PubMed ID: 28905399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
