These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3701260)

  • 41. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.
    Zentall TR; Roper KL; Sherburne LM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7714447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pigeons discriminate continuous versus discontinuous line segments.
    Kirkpatrick K; Wilkinson A; Johnston S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 17620026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pigeon memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function.
    Santiago HC; Wright AA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):498-512. PubMed ID: 6491609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Disruption of performance under a titrating matching-to-sample schedule of reinforcement by drugs of abuse.
    Wenger GR; Wright DW
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1990 Jul; 254(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 2366183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of hippocampal and area parahippocampalis lesions in pigeons: I. Delayed matching to sample.
    Colombo M; Swain N; Harper D; Alsop B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 May; 50(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 9225621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an experimental analysis of naming.
    Manabe K; Kawashima T; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jan; 63(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 7869022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory.
    Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):154-73. PubMed ID: 1583445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Scratch and match: pigeons learn matching and oddity with gravel stimuli.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8308488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli.
    White KG; McKenzie J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 7175430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of training delays and start and stop markers on the choose-short effect in pigeons.
    Talarico DC; Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):98-106. PubMed ID: 16095850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of chemicals on delayed matching in pigeons IV: Effects of trimethyltin.
    Idemudia SO; McMillan DE
    Neurotoxicology; 1986; 7(3):75-87. PubMed ID: 3822263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: Reflexivity or transitivity.
    Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 22287802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effects of associative congruence and dimensional similarity of samples in delayed matching by pigeons.
    Santi A
    Behav Processes; 1991 Jul; 24(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 24896425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Attention in humans and animals: is there a capacity limitation at the time of encoding?
    Lamb MR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1991 Jan; 17(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 2002306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Development of a single-code/default coding strategy in pigeons.
    Clement TS; Zentall TR
    Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 11273414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children.
    Boelens H; Smeets P
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):135-52. PubMed ID: 2367687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
    Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.
    Campos HC; Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 24436073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pigeons' spatial memory: III. Effect of distractors on delayed matching of key location.
    Wilkie DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 6631313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.