162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37012623)
1. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance.
Pielage H; Zekveld AA; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 33795615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
Keur-Huizinga L; Huizinga NA; Zekveld AA; Versfeld NJ; van de Ven SRB; van Dijk WAJ; de Geus EJC; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Hearing Loss on the Pupil Response to Degraded Speech.
Zekveld AA; Pielage H; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):4083-4099. PubMed ID: 37699194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic Comparison of Trial Exclusion Criteria for Pupillometry Data Analysis in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness and Normal Hearing.
Burg EA; Thakkar T; Fields T; Misurelli SM; Kuchinsky SE; Roche J; Lee DJ; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211013256. PubMed ID: 34024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
