These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37012897)

  • 1. CRM and partial order CRM with adaptive rescaling for dose-finding in immunotherapy trials with a continuous outcome.
    Saha PT; Fine JP; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2409-2419. PubMed ID: 37012897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quasi-partial order continual reassessment method: Applying toxicity scores to cancer dose-finding drug combination trials.
    O'Connell NS; Wages NA; Garrett-Mayer E
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 125():107050. PubMed ID: 36529437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.
    James GD; Symeonides S; Marshall J; Young J; Clack G
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 33402104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples.
    van Werkhoven E; Hinsley S; Frangou E; Holmes J; de Haan R; Hawkins M; Brown S; Love SB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):162. PubMed ID: 32571298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.
    Ezzalfani M; Zohar S; Qin R; Mandrekar SJ; Deley MC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2728-46. PubMed ID: 23335156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.
    Wheeler GM; Mander AP; Bedding A; Brock K; Cornelius V; Grieve AP; Jaki T; Love SB; Odondi L; Weir CJ; Yap C; Bond SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30658575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the time-to-event continual reassessment method in the presence of partial orders.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 22806898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.
    Bayar MA; Ivanova A; Le Teuff G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():211-223. PubMed ID: 31200907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
    Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.
    Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
    Clin Trials; 2012 Jun; 9(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 22547420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency of the CRM when the dose-toxicity curve is not monotone and its application to the POCRM.
    Saha PT; Fine JP; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(8):2073-2082. PubMed ID: 33588519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
    Zhu J; Sabanés Bové D; Liao Z; Beyer U; Yung G; Sarkar S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106436. PubMed ID: 34000410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
    Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specifications of a continual reassessment method design for phase I trials of combined drugs.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 23729323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
    Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30309262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GUIP1: a R package for dose escalation strategies in phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Dinart D; Fraisse J; Tosi D; Mauguen A; Touraine C; Gourgou S; Le Deley MC; Bellera C; Mollevi C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):134. PubMed ID: 32580715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of the initial design for the two-stage continual reassessment method.
    Jia X; Ivanova A; Lee SM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 28300466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.
    Garrett-Mayer E
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 16539090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.