These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37012967)

  • 1. Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check.
    Stambaugh C; Yancey J; Shukla U; Melhus C; Stambaugh N
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e35695. PubMed ID: 37012967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-institutional evaluation of machine performance check system on treatment beam output and symmetry using statistical process control.
    Binny D; Aland T; Archibald-Heeren BR; Trapp JV; Kairn T; Crowe SB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 20(3):71-80. PubMed ID: 30786139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Daily QA of linear accelerators using only EPID and OBI.
    Sun B; Goddu SM; Yaddanapudi S; Noel C; Li H; Cai B; Kavanaugh J; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5584-94. PubMed ID: 26429233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):139-150. PubMed ID: 28291921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC) geometric checks for daily IGRT geometric accuracy quality assurance.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):200-206. PubMed ID: 28332342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility study of performing IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device.
    Peng JL; Kahler D; Li JG; Amdur RJ; Vanek KN; Liu C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 12(3):3535. PubMed ID: 21844867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Machine Performance Check application for TrueBeam Linac.
    Clivio A; Vanetti E; Rose S; Nicolini G; Belosi MF; Cozzi L; Baltes C; Fogliata A
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():97. PubMed ID: 25896341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems.
    Mao W; Speiser M; Medin P; Papiez L; Solberg T; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2335-41. PubMed ID: 21776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC): mechanical and collimation checks.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):56-66. PubMed ID: 28419702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive radiation and imaging isocenter verification using NIPAM kV-CBCT dosimetry.
    Pant K; Umeh C; Oldham M; Floyd S; Giles W; Adamson J
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):927-936. PubMed ID: 31899806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC): OBI X-ray tube alignment procedure.
    Barnes MP; Pomare D; Menk FW; Moraro B; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):68-78. PubMed ID: 30178521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term experience of MPC across multiple TrueBeam linacs: MPC concordance with conventional QC and sensitivity to real-world faults.
    Pearson M; Eaton D; Greener T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):224-235. PubMed ID: 32790139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA.
    Manger RP; Pawlicki T; Hoisak J; Kim GY
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 30972767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A diagnostic tool for basic daily quality assurance of a Tomotherapy Hi*Art machine.
    de Vondel IV; Tournel K; Verellen D; Duchateau M; Lelie S; Storme G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 10(4):151-164. PubMed ID: 19918225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factor 10 Expedience of Monthly Linac Quality Assurance via an Ion Chamber Array and Automation Scripts.
    Skinner LB; Yang Y; Hsu A; Xing L; Yu AS; Niedermayr T
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819876897. PubMed ID: 31707931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent validation of machine performance check for the Halcyon and TrueBeam linacs for daily quality assurance.
    Li Y; Netherton T; Nitsch PL; Gao S; Klopp AH; Balter PA; Court LE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):375-382. PubMed ID: 30016578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring Daily QA 3 constancy for routine quality assurance on linear accelerators.
    Binny D; Lancaster CM; Kairn T; Trapp JV; Crowe SB
    Phys Med; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1479-1487. PubMed ID: 27839928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SU-E-T-202: Comprehensive Quality Assurance Procedures for Uniform Scanning Proton Therapy Machines.
    Zheng Y; Ding X; Mascia A; Hsi W; Kang Y; Ramirez E; Zeidan O; Schreuder N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3749. PubMed ID: 28517814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and implementation of EPID-based quality assurance tests for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).
    Anvari A; Poirier Y; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3246-3257. PubMed ID: 29704440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling.
    Puyati W; Khawne A; Barnes M; Zwan B; Greer P; Fuangrod T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):73-82. PubMed ID: 32543097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.