221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37013145)
21. Using a brain-machine interface to control a hybrid upper limb exoskeleton during rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions.
Hortal E; Planelles D; Resquin F; Climent JM; Azorín JM; Pons JL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Oct; 12():92. PubMed ID: 26476869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical changes, acceptance, and usability of a passive shoulder exoskeleton in manual material handling. A field study.
Schrøder Jakobsen L; de Zee M; Samani A; Desbrosses K; Madeleine P
Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104104. PubMed ID: 37531933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Functional Evaluation of a Force Sensor-Controlled Upper-Limb Power-Assisted Exoskeleton with High Backdrivability.
Liu C; Liang H; Ueda N; Li P; Fujimoto Y; Zhu C
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33182271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design and kinematic analysis of a novel upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Zeiaee A; Soltani-Zarrin R; Langari R; Tafreshi R
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():759-764. PubMed ID: 28813911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of velocity and acceleration in joint angle estimation for an EMG-Based upper-limb exoskeleton control.
Tang Z; Yu H; Yang H; Zhang L; Zhang L
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105156. PubMed ID: 34942392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A force-based human machine interface to drive a motorized upper limb exoskeleton. a pilot study.
Gandolla M; Luciani B; Pirovano DE; Pedrocchi A; Braghin F
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-6. PubMed ID: 36176155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mechanics and energetics of post-stroke walking aided by a powered ankle exoskeleton with speed-adaptive myoelectric control.
McCain EM; Dick TJM; Giest TN; Nuckols RW; Lewek MD; Saul KR; Sawicki GS
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 May; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 31092269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Mechanical Design and Research of Wearable Exoskeleton Assisted Robot for Upper Limb Rehabilitation].
Wang Z; Wang Z; Yang Y; Wang C; Yang G; Li Y
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 46(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 35150106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of a passive upper extremity exoskeleton for overhead tasks.
Yin P; Yang L; Qu S; Wang C
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2020 Dec; 55():102478. PubMed ID: 33075712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of a Multi-Joint Exoskeleton with Active-Passive Assistance for Walking.
Cao W; Zhang Z; Chen C; He Y; Wang D; Wu X
Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34677349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Instrumented Upper Limb Functional Assessment Using a Robotic Exoskeleton: Normative References Intervals.
Longatelli V; Luciani B; Pedrocchi A; Gandolla M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury.
Lajeunesse V; Vincent C; Routhier F; Careau E; Michaud F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Oct; 11(7):535-47. PubMed ID: 26340538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant.
Iranzo S; Piedrabuena A; Iordanov D; Martinez-Iranzo U; Belda-Lois JM
Appl Ergon; 2020 Sep; 87():103120. PubMed ID: 32310110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks.
Pinho JP; Forner-Cordero A
Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103718. PubMed ID: 35202960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness of robotic exoskeletons for improving gait in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.
Hunt M; Everaert L; Brown M; Muraru L; Hatzidimitriadou E; Desloovere K
Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():343-354. PubMed ID: 36306544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current Trends and Challenges in Pediatric Access to Sensorless and Sensor-Based Upper Limb Exoskeletons.
Gaudet G; Raison M; Achiche S
Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34065366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of the Mechanical Support Characteristics of a Light and Wearable Robotic Exoskeleton Prototype Applied to Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Vélez-Guerrero MA; Callejas-Cuervo M; Álvarez JC; Mazzoleni S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pilot Study of a Powered Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Based on the Wheelchair.
Meng Q; Xie Q; Shao H; Cao W; Wang F; Wang L; Yu H; Li S
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9627438. PubMed ID: 31976331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a spring-loaded upper-limb exoskeleton in cleaning activities.
Pacifico I; Aprigliano F; Parri A; Cannillo G; Melandri I; Sabatini AM; Violante FS; Molteni F; Giovacchini F; Vitiello N; Crea S
Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103877. PubMed ID: 36095895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exoskeleton robots for lower limb assistance: A review of materials, actuation, and manufacturing methods.
Hussain F; Goecke R; Mohammadian M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 34254562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
