These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37013199)

  • 1. STATISTICAL TESTS FOR LARGE TREE-STRUCTURED DATA.
    Bharath K; Kambadur P; Dey DK; Rao A; Baladandayuthapani V
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(520):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 37013199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Escape regimes of biased random walks on Galton-Watson trees.
    Bowditch A
    Probab Theory Relat Fields; 2018; 170(3):685-768. PubMed ID: 31258234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional Data Analysis of Tree Data Objects.
    Shen D; Shen H; Bhamidi S; Maldonado YM; Kim Y; Marron JS
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2014; 23(2):418-438. PubMed ID: 25346588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal goodness-of-fit tests for recurrent event data.
    Stocker RS; Adekpedjou A
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2011 Jul; 17(3):409-32. PubMed ID: 21380542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association testing for binary trees-A Markov branching process approach.
    Wu X; Zhu H
    Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2557-2573. PubMed ID: 35262202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A class of goodness-of-fit test for the additive hazards model with case-cohort data.
    Cao Y; Yu J
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 33305424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employing phylogenetic tree shape statistics to resolve the underlying host population structure.
    Kayondo HW; Ssekagiri A; Nabakooza G; Bbosa N; Ssemwanga D; Kaleebu P; Mwalili S; Mango JM; Leigh Brown AJ; Saenz RA; Galiwango R; Kitayimbwa JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):546. PubMed ID: 34758743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modern Phylogenomics: Building Phylogenetic Trees Using the Multispecies Coalescent Model.
    Liu L; Anderson C; Pearl D; Edwards SV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():211-239. PubMed ID: 31278666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goodness-of-fit tests for a logistic regression model with missing covariates.
    Lee SM; Tran PL; Li CS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1031-1050. PubMed ID: 35345942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Goodness of Fit Tests for Linear Mixed Models.
    Tang M; Slud EV; Pfeiffer RM
    J Multivar Anal; 2014 Sep; 130():176-193. PubMed ID: 28503001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tree-space statistics and approximations for large-scale analysis of anatomical trees.
    Feragen A; Owen M; Petersen J; Wille MM; Thomsen LH; Dirksen A; de Bruijne M
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():74-85. PubMed ID: 24683959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The large-sample asymptotic behaviour of quartet-based summary methods for species tree inference.
    Chan YB; Li Q; Scornavacca C
    J Math Biol; 2022 Aug; 85(3):22. PubMed ID: 35976512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A working guide to boosted regression trees.
    Elith J; Leathwick JR; Hastie T
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 18397250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graph limits of random graphs from a subset of connected k-trees.
    Drmota M; Jin EY; Stufler B
    Random Struct Algorithms; 2019 Aug; 55(1):125-152. PubMed ID: 31423073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness of fit tests for random effect models with binary responses.
    Korre AK; Vasdekis VGS
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4571-4587. PubMed ID: 30125377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Well Does Your Phylogenetic Model Fit Your Data?
    A Shepherd D; Klaere S
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 30329125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tree-based Methods for Characterizing Tumor Density Heterogeneity.
    Shoemaker K; Hobbs BP; Bharath K; Ng CS; Baladandayuthapani V
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():216-227. PubMed ID: 29218883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.