371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37013585)
1. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology.
Yang Y; Hillebrand H; Lagisz M; Cleasby I; Nakagawa S
Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Feb; 28(3):969-989. PubMed ID: 34736291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.
Jennions MD; Møller AP
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 May; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12056747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect Declines Are Systematic, Strong, and Ubiquitous: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of the Decline Effect in Intelligence Research.
Pietschnig J; Siegel M; Eder JSN; Gittler G
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2874. PubMed ID: 31920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Kirkham J; Dwan K; Kramer S; Green S; Forbes A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):MR000035. PubMed ID: 25271098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
Friese M; Frankenbach J
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution.
Jennions MD; Møller AP
Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):43-8. PubMed ID: 11788035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
Kicinski M
BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.
O'Dea RE; Lagisz M; Jennions MD; Koricheva J; Noble DWA; Parker TH; Gurevitch J; Page MJ; Stewart G; Moher D; Nakagawa S
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Oct; 96(5):1695-1722. PubMed ID: 33960637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cumulative meta-analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology.
Leimu R; Koricheva J
Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Sep; 271(1551):1961-6. PubMed ID: 15347521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.
Cassey P; Ewen JG; Blackburn TM; Møller AP
Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S451-4. PubMed ID: 15801601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility in the absence of selective reporting: An illustration from large-scale brain asymmetry research.
Kong XZ; ; Francks C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jan; 43(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 32841457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating publication bias in meta-analyses of peer-reviewed studies: A meta-meta-analysis across disciplines and journal tiers.
Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):176-191. PubMed ID: 33108053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
Wicherts JM
Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
