371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37013585)
21. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. "What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018).
Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 145(7):764. PubMed ID: 31192651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The earth is flat (
Amrhein V; Korner-Nievergelt F; Roth T
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3544. PubMed ID: 28698825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):220946. PubMed ID: 36533197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
Lin L
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review.
Filges T; Siren A; Fridberg T; Nielsen BCV
Campbell Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 16(4):e1124. PubMed ID: 37016617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
Vavken P; Dorotka R
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.
Lakens D; Hilgard J; Staaks J
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 27241618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.
Gelman A; Carlin J
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 26186114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology.
Kimmel K; Avolio ML; Ferraro PJ
Nat Ecol Evol; 2023 Sep; 7(9):1525-1536. PubMed ID: 37537387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution.
Fidler F; Chee YE; Wintle BC; Burgman MA; McCarthy MA; Gordon A
Bioscience; 2017 Mar; 67(3):282-289. PubMed ID: 28596617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
Schneck A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Finding the power to reduce publication bias.
Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JP
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1580-1598. PubMed ID: 28127782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.
Mueller KF; Meerpohl JJ; Briel M; Antes G; von Elm E; Lang B; Gloy V; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D
Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2():60. PubMed ID: 23885765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
