These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37013585)

  • 41. Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics.
    Bartoš F; Maier M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nippold F; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA; Otte WM; Sladekova M; Deresssa TK; Bruns SB; Fanelli D; Stanley TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):500-511. PubMed ID: 38327122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.
    Karabatsos G
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 28985020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta-analyses.
    Konno K; Pullin AS
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):698-713. PubMed ID: 32618107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
    Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Are effect sizes in self-efficacy field changing over time? A meta-meta analysis.
    Jiao X; Yu X; Wang S; Wang Z; Gong Z
    Int J Psychol; 2021 Oct; 56(5):801-811. PubMed ID: 33337546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis.
    Nuijten MB; van Assen MALM; Augusteijn HEM; Crompvoets EAV; Wicherts JM
    J Intell; 2020 Oct; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 33023250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
    Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Times are changing, bias isn't: A meta-meta-analysis on publication bias detection practices, prevalence rates, and predictors in industrial/organizational psychology.
    Siegel M; Eder JSN; Wicherts JM; Pietschnig J
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Nov; 107(11):2013-2039. PubMed ID: 34968082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: recommendations for research and educational practice.
    Funder DC; Levine JM; Mackie DM; Morf CC; Sansone C; Vazire S; West SG
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 Feb; 18(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 24214149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nonindependence and sensitivity analyses in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses.
    Noble DWA; Lagisz M; O'dea RE; Nakagawa S
    Mol Ecol; 2017 May; 26(9):2410-2425. PubMed ID: 28133832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Publication bias in obesity treatment trials?
    Allison DB; Faith MS; Gorman BS
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Oct; 20(10):931-7. PubMed ID: 8910098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
    de Winter J; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66463. PubMed ID: 23840479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jan; 13(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 34628722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Meta-analytic Techniques to Assess the Association Between N-acetylcysteine and Acute Kidney Injury After Contrast Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Magner K; Ilin JV; Clark EG; Kong JWY; Davis A; Hiremath S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jul; 5(7):e2220671. PubMed ID: 35788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pooling resources to enhance rigour in psychophysiological research: Insights from open science approaches to meta-analysis.
    Saunders B; Inzlicht M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Apr; 162():112-120. PubMed ID: 33529643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
    Sutton AJ; Duval SJ; Tweedie RL; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7249):1574-7. PubMed ID: 10845965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.