These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37014009)
1. Imagining, designing, and interpreting experiments: Using quantitative assessment to improve instruction in scientific reasoning. Coleman AB; Lorenzo K; McLamb F; Sanku A; Khan S; Bozinovic G Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2023; 51(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 37014009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation, necessity, and sufficiency: Common errors in the scientific reasoning of undergraduate students for interpreting experiments. Coleman AB; Lam DP; Soowal LN Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2015; 43(5):305-15. PubMed ID: 26146931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory Courses with Guided-Inquiry Modules Improve Scientific Reasoning and Experimental Design Skills for the Least-Prepared Undergraduate Students. Blumer LS; Beck CW CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 18(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 30681903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of clinical reasoning from the basic sciences to the clerkships: a longitudinal assessment of medical students' needs and self-perception after a transitional learning unit. van Gessel E; Nendaz MR; Vermeulen B; Junod A; Vu NV Med Educ; 2003 Nov; 37(11):966-74. PubMed ID: 14629409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating quantitative thinking into an introductory biology course improves students' mathematical reasoning in biological contexts. Hester S; Buxner S; Elfring L; Nagy L CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 24591504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers. Dowd JE; Thompson RJ; Schiff LA; Reynolds JA CBE Life Sci Educ; 2018; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 29326103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of problem-based self-designed experiments in physiology laboratory teaching. Ding YM; Shen WD; Yang J; He Y; Wang LL; Zhang X Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 36892867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An introductory biology research-rich laboratory course shows improvements in students' research skills, confidence, and attitudes. Pavlova IV; Remington DL; Horton M; Tomlin E; Hens MD; Chen D; Willse J; Schug MD PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261278. PubMed ID: 34914796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Student interpretations of phylogenetic trees in an introductory biology course. Dees J; Momsen JL; Niemi J; Montplaisir L CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):666-76. PubMed ID: 25452489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses. Smith AC; Stewart R; Shields P; Hayes-Klosteridis J; Robinson P; Yuan R Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15917873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teaching and assessing undergraduate collaboration skills scaffolded through the biochemistry curriculum using collaboration rubrics and student learning contracts. Mertz PS; Sherrer SM; Bowers GM Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2023; 51(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 37341458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students' clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review. Plackett R; Kassianos AP; Mylan S; Kambouri M; Raine R; Sheringham J BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):365. PubMed ID: 35550085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A set of vertically integrated inquiry-based practical curricula that develop scientific thinking skills for large cohorts of undergraduate students. Zimbardi K; Bugarcic A; Colthorpe K; Good JP; Lluka LJ Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Dec; 37(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 24292906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Covariational reasoning and item context affect language in undergraduate mass balance written explanations. Shiroda M; Doherty JH; Scott EE; Haudek KC Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Dec; 47(4):762-775. PubMed ID: 37615044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supplemental instruction in introductory biology I: enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students. Rath KA; Peterfreund AR; Xenos SP; Bayliss F; Carnal N CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 17785403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foundations in physiology: an introductory course using the core concepts. Ball KL Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):501-507. PubMed ID: 37227228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of respiratory physiology and clinical reasoning in the early years of a medical curriculum: engaging with students in a large classroom setting. Hakim A; Ricketts W; Pfeffer P; Ashworth R Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):237-242. PubMed ID: 36861766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A developmental assessment of clinical reasoning in preclinical medical education. Min Simpkins AA; Koch B; Spear-Ellinwood K; St John P Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1591257. PubMed ID: 30935299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]