176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37015473)
1. In-Vivo Validation of a Novel Robotic Platform for Endovascular Intervention.
Dagnino G; Kundrat D; Kwok TMY; Abdelaziz MEMK; Chi W; Nguyen A; Riga C; Yang GZ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 70(6):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 37015473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An MR-Safe Endovascular Robotic Platform: Design, Control, and Ex-Vivo Evaluation.
Kundrat D; Dagnino G; Kwok TMY; Abdelaziz MEMK; Chi W; Nguyen A; Riga C; Yang GZ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Oct; 68(10):3110-3121. PubMed ID: 33705306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
de Ruiter QM; Moll FL; van Herwaarden JA
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 61(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 25441011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical applications of robotic technology in vascular and endovascular surgery.
Antoniou GA; Riga CV; Mayer EK; Cheshire NJ; Bicknell CD
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 53(2):493-9. PubMed ID: 20801611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual versus robot-assisted contralateral gate cannulation in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.
Cheung S; Rahman R; Bicknell C; Stoyanov D; Chang PL; Li M; Rolls A; Desender L; Van Herzeele I; Hamady M; Riga C
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Dec; 15(12):2071-2078. PubMed ID: 33070273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures.
Cochennec F; Kobeiter H; Gohel M; Marzelle J; Desgranges P; Allaire E; Becquemin JP
J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Apr; 22(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25809359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance Evaluation of a Miniature and Disposable Endovascular Robotic Device.
Vidal V; Bargellini I; Bent C; Kee S; Little M; O'Sullivan G
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2024 Apr; 47(4):503-507. PubMed ID: 38512351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation.
Riga CV; Bicknell CD; Hamady MS; Cheshire NJ
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 21620623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning-based endovascular navigation through the use of non-rigid registration for collaborative robotic catheterization.
Chi W; Liu J; Rafii-Tari H; Riga C; Bicknell C; Yang GZ
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):855-864. PubMed ID: 29651714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model.
Legeza P; Britz GW; Shah A; Sconzert K; Sungur JM; Chinnadurai P; Sinha K; Lumsden AB
J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 33550514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible robotic catheters in the visceral segment of the aorta: advantages and limitations.
Li MM; Hamady MS; Bicknell CD; Riga CV
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Jun; 59(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 29557586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.
Püschel A; Schafmayer C; Groß J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1789-1795. PubMed ID: 35226179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remote controlled robot assisted cardiac navigation: feasibility assessment and validation in a porcine model.
Ganji Y; Janabi-Sharifi F; Cheema AN
Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 22113981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting.
Riga CV; Cheshire NJ; Hamady MS; Bicknell CD
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):810-9; discussion 819-20. PubMed ID: 20347674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of robotic surgical system in the management of vascular disease.
Lin JC
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 27(7):976-83. PubMed ID: 23849652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and control of an image-guided robot for spine surgery in a hybrid OR.
Balicki M; Kyne S; Toporek G; Holthuizen R; Homan R; Popovic A; Burström G; Persson O; Edström E; Elmi-Terander A; Patriciu A
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Aug; 16(4):e2108. PubMed ID: 32270913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility and safety of remote endovascular catheter navigation in a porcine model.
Bismuth J; Kashef E; Cheshire N; Lumsden AB
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 21521066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fatima N; Massaad E; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):181-192. PubMed ID: 32976997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of robot-assisted neuroendovascular procedures.
Mendes Pereira V; Nicholson P; Cancelliere NM; Liu XYE; Agid R; Radovanovic I; Krings T
J Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 136(4):992-1004. PubMed ID: 34560642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of C-Arm Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Fusion in Maximizing the Versatility of Endovascular Robotics.
Chinnadurai P; Duran C; Al-Jabbari O; Abu Saleh WK; Lumsden A; Bismuth J
Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 Jan; 30():138-48. PubMed ID: 26256704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
