179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37016859)
1. The Use of Dual Direction Expandable Titanium Cage With Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Consideration With Preliminary Results.
Park DY; Heo DH
Neurospine; 2023 Mar; 20(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 37016859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.
Buckland AJ; Proctor DJ
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38274152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Heo DH; Jang JW; Park CK
Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2853-2862. PubMed ID: 37211555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Chang CC; Chou D; Pennicooke B; Rivera J; Tan LA; Berven S; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Nov; 34(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 33186902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biportal endoscopic extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium cage with large footprints: technical note and preliminary results.
You KH; Hwang JY; Hong SH; Kang MS; Park SM; Park HJ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jun; 165(6):1435-1443. PubMed ID: 37115323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified far lateral endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary results.
Heo DH; Eum JH; Jo JY; Chung H
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Apr; 163(4):1205-1209. PubMed ID: 33606101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical Feasibility and Early Clinical Outcome of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Larger Cage.
Kim JE; Son S; Park EJ
World Neurosurg; 2023 Oct; 178():e666-e672. PubMed ID: 37543195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.
Kim CW; Doerr TM; Luna IY; Joshua G; Shen SR; Fu X; Wu AM
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():228-235. PubMed ID: 26921700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technique of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Heo DH; Hong YH; Lee DC; Chung HJ; Park CK
Neurospine; 2020 Jul; 17(Suppl 1):S129-S137. PubMed ID: 32746526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.
Sim DS; Kasivishvanaath A; Jiang L; Cheong Soh RC; Ling ZM
Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):520-525. PubMed ID: 37076255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.
Kang MS; Heo DH; Kim HB; Chung HT
Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Dec; 15(suppl 3):S84-S92. PubMed ID: 35027471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages.
Zhong HZ; Tian DS; Zhou Y; Jing JH; Qian J; Chen L; Zhu B
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1211-8. PubMed ID: 26830783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results with a Multidimensional, Expandable Interbody Implant in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Kucharzyk DW; Miller LE
Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e7070. PubMed ID: 32226671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alvi MA; Kurian SJ; Wahood W; Goyal A; Elder BD; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():596-606.e1. PubMed ID: 30954733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Two years follow-up.
Boktor JG; Pockett RD; Verghese N
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2018; 9(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29755237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
