These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37017438)

  • 1. A comparison of maxillary canine retraction into healed and recent extraction sites using cone beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.
    Almaasarani SG; Rajeh N
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Jul; 93(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 37017438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial.
    Attia AM; Shibl LA; Dehis HM; Mostafa YA; El-Beialy AR
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Sep; 94(5):532-540. PubMed ID: 39230024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Upper and Lower Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bakr AR; Nadim MA; Sedky YW; El Kady AA
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37191. PubMed ID: 37159786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of orthodontic tooth movement between adolescents and adults based on implant superimposition.
    Ruan MJ; Chen G; Xu TM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197281. PubMed ID: 29813088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction:
    da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone of adolescents with bimaxillary protrusion via cone beam computed tomography].
    Yinghong L; Zeyuan Z; Kui Z; Caomin T; Jun W
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 34(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27266204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the changes of alveolar bone around the upper incisors after retraction with mini implant anchorage using cone-beam CT].
    Chen X; Zhang XF; Huang QQ; Zhang Y; Wang HQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Apr; 27(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 30146641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Eid FY; El-Kalza AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1024. PubMed ID: 39215274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary tooth movement in extraction patients with three different miniscrew anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang L; Guo R; Xu B; Wang Y; Li W
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Dec; 23(1):46. PubMed ID: 36529797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence.
    Lin L; Ahn HW; Kim SJ; Moon SC; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 25490552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.