163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37018137)
1. Multiscale adaptive differential abundance analysis in microbial compositional data.
Wang S
Bioinformatics; 2023 Apr; 39(4):. PubMed ID: 37018137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An adaptive direction-assisted test for microbiome compositional data.
Zhang W; Liu A; Zhang Z; Chen G; Li Q
Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 38(14):3493-3500. PubMed ID: 35640978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel normalization and differential abundance test framework for microbiome data.
Ma Y; Luo Y; Jiang H
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(13):3959-3965. PubMed ID: 32311021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transformation and differential abundance analysis of microbiome data incorporating phylogeny.
Zhou C; Zhao H; Wang T
Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(24):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 34302462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A maximum-type microbial differential abundance test with application to high-dimensional microbiome data analyses.
Li Z; Yu X; Guo H; Lee T; Hu J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():988717. PubMed ID: 36389165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zero is not absence: censoring-based differential abundance analysis for microbiome data.
Chan LS; Li G
Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 38331411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A two-part mixed-effects model for analyzing longitudinal microbiome compositional data.
Chen EZ; Li H
Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2611-7. PubMed ID: 27187200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. gmcoda: Graphical model for multiple compositional vectors in microbiome studies.
Fang H
Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37975866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An omnibus test for differential distribution analysis of microbiome sequencing data.
Chen J; King E; Deek R; Wei Z; Yu Y; Grill D; Ballman K; Stegle O
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 29040451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. fastCCLasso: a fast and efficient algorithm for estimating correlation matrix from compositional data.
Zhang S; Fang H; Hu T
Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 38730540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An empirical Bayes approach to normalization and differential abundance testing for microbiome data.
Liu T; Zhao H; Wang T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):225. PubMed ID: 32493208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive evaluation of microbial differential abundance analysis methods: current status and potential solutions.
Yang L; Chen J
Microbiome; 2022 Aug; 10(1):130. PubMed ID: 35986393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CACONET: a novel classification framework for microbial correlation networks.
Xu Y; Nash K; Acharjee A; Gkoutos GV
Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(6):1639-1647. PubMed ID: 34983063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. mbDecoda: a debiased approach to compositional data analysis for microbiome surveys.
Zong Y; Zhao H; Wang T
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38701410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R.
Peschel S; Müller CL; von Mutius E; Boulesteix AL; Depner M
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33264391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct interaction network inference for compositional data via codaloss.
Chen L; He S; Zhai Y; Deng M
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2050037. PubMed ID: 33106076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Novel Sparse Compositional Technique Reveals Microbial Perturbations.
Martino C; Morton JT; Marotz CA; Thompson LR; Tripathi A; Knight R; Zengler K
mSystems; 2019; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 30801021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A strategy for differential abundance analysis of sparse microbiome data with group-wise structured zeros.
Abegaz F; Abedini D; White F; Guerrieri A; Zancarini A; Dong L; Westerhuis JA; van Eeuwijk F; Bouwmeester H; Smilde AK
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12433. PubMed ID: 38816496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LOCOM: A logistic regression model for testing differential abundance in compositional microbiome data with false discovery rate control.
Hu Y; Satten GA; Hu YJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(30):e2122788119. PubMed ID: 35867822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved detection of disease-associated gut microbes using 16S sequence-based biomarkers.
Chrisman BS; Paskov KM; Stockham N; Jung JY; Varma M; Washington PY; Tataru C; Iwai S; DeSantis TZ; David M; Wall DP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):509. PubMed ID: 34666677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
