410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37018626)
1. Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.
Valera MA; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Pérez-Albalá S; Romany L; Remohí J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1060-1075. PubMed ID: 37018626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.
Bori L; Meseguer F; Valera MA; Galan A; Remohi J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 35435210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
Diakiw SM; Hall JMM; VerMilyea MD; Amin J; Aizpurua J; Giardini L; Briones YG; Lim AYX; Dakka MA; Nguyen TV; Perugini D; Perugini M
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BlastAssist: a deep learning pipeline to measure interpretable features of human embryos.
Yang HY; Leahy BD; Jang WD; Wei D; Kalma Y; Rahav R; Carmon A; Kopel R; Azem F; Venturas M; Kelleher CP; Cam L; Pfister H; Needleman DJ; Ben-Yosef D
Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):698-708. PubMed ID: 38396213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?
Fordham DE; Rosentraub D; Polsky AL; Aviram T; Wolf Y; Perl O; Devir A; Rosentraub S; Silver DH; Gold Zamir Y; Bronstein AM; Lara Lara M; Ben Nagi J; Alvarez A; Munné S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2275-2290. PubMed ID: 35944167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts.
Popovic M; Borot L; Lorenzon AR; Lopes ALRC; Sakkas D; Lledó B; Morales R; Ortiz JA; Polyzos NP; Parriego M; Azpiroz F; Galain M; Pujol A; Menten B; Dhaenens L; Vanden Meerschaut F; Stoop D; Rodriguez M; de la Blanca EP; Rodríguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):258-274. PubMed ID: 37873575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A propensity score-based, comparative study assessing humid and dry time-lapse incubation, with single-step medium, on embryo development and clinical outcomes.
Valera MÁ; Albert C; Marcos J; Larreategui Z; Bori L; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2022 Aug; 37(9):1980-1993. PubMed ID: 35904473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Late follicular phase progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation is not associated with decreased implantation of chromosomally screened embryos in thaw cycles.
Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Alkon-Meadows T; Luna-Rojas M; Mukherjee T; Copperman AB; Sandler B
Hum Reprod; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1889-1899. PubMed ID: 32649755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human blastocyst spontaneous collapse is associated with worse morphological quality and higher degeneration and aneuploidy rates: a comprehensive analysis standardized through artificial intelligence.
Cimadomo D; Marconetto A; Trio S; Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Albricci L; Erlich I; Ben-Meir A; Har-Vardi I; Kantor B; Sakov A; Coticchio G; Borini A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2291-2306. PubMed ID: 35939563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
Kirkegaard K; Sundvall L; Erlandsen M; Hindkjær JJ; Knudsen UB; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study.
Lee T; Peirce K; Natalwala J; Chapple V; Mark PJ; Sanders K; Liu Y
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):955-962. PubMed ID: 38553025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.
Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Vaiarelli A; Maggiulli R; Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 31247100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies.
Irani M; Canon C; Robles A; Maddy B; Gunnala V; Qin X; Zhang C; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1082-1089. PubMed ID: 32348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
