These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37018642)

  • 21. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NITS-IQA Database: A New Image Quality Assessment Database.
    Ruikar J; Chaudhury S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Features.
    Chen B; Zhu L; Kong C; Zhu H; Wang S; Li Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6139-6151. PubMed ID: 36112560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].
    Gao Q; Zhu M; Li D; Bian Z; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 41(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 33624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain.
    Mittal A; Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Dec; 21(12):4695-708. PubMed ID: 22910118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Opinion-Unaware Blind Quality Assessment of Multiply and Singly Distorted Images via Distortion Parameter Estimation.
    Zhang Y; Chandler DM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30028705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning No-Reference Quality Assessment of Multiply and Singly Distorted Images with Big Data.
    Zhang Y; Mou X; Chandler DM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 31794396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic no-reference image quality assessment.
    Li H; Hu W; Xu ZN
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1097. PubMed ID: 27468398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Wang Z; Li Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 May; 20(5):1185-98. PubMed ID: 21078577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. VCRNet: Visual Compensation Restoration Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Pan Z; Yuan F; Lei J; Fang Y; Shao X; Kwong S
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1613-1627. PubMed ID: 35081029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medical Image Quality Assessment Using CSO Based Deep Neural Network.
    Jayageetha J; Vasanthanayaki C
    J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(11):224. PubMed ID: 30288616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 3D-MAD: A Full Reference Stereoscopic Image Quality Estimator Based on Binocular Lightness and Contrast Perception.
    Zhang Y; Chandler DM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):3810-25. PubMed ID: 26186775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deep CNN-Based Blind Image Quality Predictor.
    Kim J; Nguyen AD; Lee S
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2019 Jan; 30(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 29994270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ESIM: Edge Similarity for Screen Content Image Quality Assessment.
    Ni Z; Ma L; Zeng H; Chen J; Cai C; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Oct; 26(10):4818-4831. PubMed ID: 28644808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel algorithm for comprehensive quality assessment of clinical magnetic resonance images based on natural scene statistics in spatial domain.
    Ikushima Y; Tokurei S; Tarewaki H; Morishita J; Yabuuchi H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():203-211. PubMed ID: 35842195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rectangular-Normalized Superpixel Entropy Index for Image Quality Assessment.
    Lu T; Wang J; Zhou H; Jiang J; Ma J; Wang Z
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Dec; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 33266671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.