These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37018897)
1. Understanding healthcare providers' electronic health record (EHR) interface preferences via conjoint analysis. Diño MJ; Catajan MW; Patricio C; Vital JC; Gotinga TJ; Crisostomo ML; Alonzo ML; Ferrer L; Araga C; San Diego R; Bartolome F; Uayan ML; Orata E; Aguilar A; Chua M Int J Med Inform; 2023 Jun; 174():105060. PubMed ID: 37018897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Healthcare providers' readiness for electronic health record adoption: a cross-sectional study during pre-implementation phase. Ngusie HS; Kassie SY; Chereka AA; Enyew EB BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):282. PubMed ID: 35232436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record. Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland. Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems. Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical investigation into the preferences of the elderly for user interface design in personal electronic health record systems. Zhang S; Song J Front Digit Health; 2023; 5():1289904. PubMed ID: 38348367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges. Leventhal JC; Cummins JA; Schwartz PH; Martin DK; Tierney WM J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. PubMed ID: 25480722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategizing EHR use to achieve patient-centered care in exam rooms: a qualitative study on primary care providers. Zhang J; Chen Y; Ashfaq S; Bell K; Calvitti A; Farber NJ; Gabuzda MT; Gray B; Liu L; Rick S; Street RL; Zheng K; Zuest D; Agha Z J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Jan; 23(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 26568605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study. Mishuris RG; Yoder J; Wilson D; Mann D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 27401606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of electronic health record promotion for healthcare providers in the United States since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: An empirical investigation. Yuan B; Li J; Wu P Int J Health Plann Manage; 2021 Mar; 36(2):334-352. PubMed ID: 33025639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Providers' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Electronic Health Records in Identifying Opioid Misuse. Glenn J; Gibson D; Thiesset HF J Healthc Manag; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 68(6):390-403. PubMed ID: 37944171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paper- and computer-based workarounds to electronic health record use at three benchmark institutions. Flanagan ME; Saleem JJ; Millitello LG; Russ AL; Doebbeling BN J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e59-66. PubMed ID: 23492593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinician in the Driver's Seat: part 1 - a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record platform. Senathirajah Y; Bakken S; Kaufman D J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():165-76. PubMed ID: 25240253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing Privacy Controls for Patients via a Selective Authentic Electronic Health Record Exchange Service: Qualitative Study of Perspectives by Medical Professionals and Patients. Alaqra AS; Fischer-Hübner S; Framner E J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10954. PubMed ID: 30578189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not another box to check! Using the UTAUT to explore nurses' psychological adaptation to electronic health record usability. Winckler D Nurs Forum; 2022 May; 57(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 34957564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study. McGinn CA; Gagnon MP; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Abdeljelil AB; Légaré F BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22967231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic health record on the go: Device form factor and Fitts' law. Drews FA; Zadra JR; Gleed J Int J Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 111():37-44. PubMed ID: 29425632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review. Tapuria A; Porat T; Kalra D; Dsouza G; Xiaohui S; Curcin V Inform Health Soc Care; 2021 Jun; 46(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 33840342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes. Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]