These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37019309)

  • 1. Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Weintraub MT; DeBenedetti A; Nam D; Darrith B; Baker CM; Waren D; Schwarzkopf R; Courtney PM; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S206-S210. PubMed ID: 37019309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No Difference in Dislocation Rates Comparing Large Diameter Jumbo Femoral Heads and Dual-Mobility Bearings in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Sonn KA; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3716-3721. PubMed ID: 34391597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
    Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversion of Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing a Dual-Mobility Construct Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
    Chalmers BP; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3071-3075. PubMed ID: 28579448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
    Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Pitz-Gonçalves LI; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S124-S130. PubMed ID: 36791889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-mobility constructs versus large femoral head bearings in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Hoskins W; McDonald L; Claireaux H; Bingham R; Griffin X
    Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):685-696. PubMed ID: 35438011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements.
    Addona JL; Gu A; De Martino I; Malahias MA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2793-2798. PubMed ID: 31402075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads.
    Beckert M; Meneghini RM; Meding JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S571-S576. PubMed ID: 35271976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture.
    Rogmark C; Nåtman J; Jobory A; Hailer NP; Cnudde P
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):844-851. PubMed ID: 35775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Stoney J; Graves SE; Bingham R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Aug; 104(16):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 35703140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
    van Steenbergen LN; de Reus IM; Hannink G; Vehmeijer SB; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
    Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femoral Head and Liner Exchange in Patients with Atraumatic Dislocation. Results of a Retrospective Study with 6 Years Follow-Up.
    Hanslmeier MG; Maier MW; Feisst M; Beckmann NA
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 34833405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
    Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
    Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.