145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37022533)
21. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in differential diagnosis and prognostic prediction of solitary of fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (WHOII) and atypical meningioma.
Lu Z; You Z; Xie D; Wang Z
Technol Health Care; 2019; 27(2):137-147. PubMed ID: 30664513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds for diagnosis of medulloblastoma using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Pierce TT; Provenzale JM
Neuroradiol J; 2014 Feb; 27(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 24571835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative Analysis of Amide Proton Transfer MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Assessing p53 and Ki-67 Expression of Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Li L; Chen W; Yan Z; Feng J; Hu S; Liu B; Liu X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 52(5):1487-1496. PubMed ID: 32524685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differentiating atypical meningioma from anaplastic meningioma using diffusion weighted imaging.
Han T; Zhang J; Liu X; Zhang B; Deng L; Lin X; Jing M; Zhou J
Clin Imaging; 2022 Feb; 82():237-243. PubMed ID: 34915318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis to preoperative evaluate intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: Relationship to Ki-67 proliferation index.
Yang H; Liu X; Jiang J; Zhou J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 220():107364. PubMed ID: 35872434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating angiomatous meningioma from atypical meningioma.
Liu X; Wang Y; Wei J; Li S; Xue C; Deng J; Liu H; Sun Q; Zhang X; Zhou J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 221():107406. PubMed ID: 35932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from angiomatous meningioma.
He W; Xiao X; Li X; Guo Y; Guo L; Liu X; Xu Y; Zhou J; Wu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 112():186-191. PubMed ID: 30777209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiating between adult intracranial medulloblastoma and ependymoma using MRI.
Deng J; Xue C; Liu X; Li S; Zhou J
Clin Radiol; 2023 Mar; 78(3):e288-e293. PubMed ID: 36646528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of a high b-value for diffusion weighted imaging of peritumoral regions to differentiate high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases.
Han C; Huang S; Guo J; Zhuang X; Han H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25223489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer.
Surov A; Meyer HJ; Schob S; Höhn AK; Bremicker K; Exner M; Stumpp P; Purz S
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):28285-28296. PubMed ID: 28423698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis.
Surov A; Clauser P; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Meyer HJ; Wienke A
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):58. PubMed ID: 29921323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and histopathologic factors in breast cancer.
Tuan Linh L; Minh Duc N; Minh Duc N; Tra My TT; Viet Bang L; Cong Tien N; Minh Thong P
Clin Ter; 2021 May; 172(3):218-224. PubMed ID: 33956041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis be helpful to evaluate breast phyllode tumor grades?
Guo Y; Tang WJ; Kong QC; Liang YY; Han XR; Zheng BJ; Sun L; Wei XH; Jin Z; Liu CL
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():25-31. PubMed ID: 31005172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Ding C; Zhang M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 32366108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Benefit of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Evaluating the Invasiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Jing M; Cao Y; Zhang P; Zhang B; Lin X; Deng L; Han T; Zhou J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():719480. PubMed ID: 34504795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility and usefulness of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for predicting program death-ligand 1 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Zhong X; Li L; Yin J; Chen Y; Xin X; Yu L; Tang Y; Zhang J; Li J
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Oct; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 37828560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging.
Zhu SC; Liu YH; Wei Y; Li LL; Dou SW; Sun TY; Shi DP
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 24(8):929-940. PubMed ID: 29491686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differentiation between sinonasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas by RESOLVE DWI combined with conventional MRI.
He M; Tang Z; Qiang J; Xiao Z; Zhang Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():10-17. PubMed ID: 31212002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
