These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37023496)
1. Mode of delivery after labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for women with unfavorable cervix at term. Jolivet S; Delavallade M; Giraud A; Chauleur C; Raia-Barjat T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jun; 285():7-11. PubMed ID: 37023496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Labor induction in term gravidas with prelabor rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervixes: Oxytocin versus vaginal misoprostol. Zhang C; Jiang H; Kong L; Feng Y; Zhou L Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 May; 161(2):536-543. PubMed ID: 36334070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks. Sire F; Ponthier L; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Aubard Y; Coste Mazeau P Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):14996. PubMed ID: 36056056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone. Ayaz A; Shaukat S; Farooq MU; Mehmood K; Ahmad I; Ali Bahoo ML Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 49(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 20708519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Neiger R; Greaves PC Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial. Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a comparison study. Neri C; Familiari A; Preziosi F; Vassallo C; Botta A; Lanzone A; Carducci B; Caruso A Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Aug; 70(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 29376620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets. Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]